摘要
目的了解厦门市口腔专科医师及口腔全科医师对牙外伤的认知程度。方法通过问卷网制作关于牙外伤知识的问卷调查表,分享到厦门口腔医师微信群,对群内的厦门地区执业的口腔专业医师进行调查问卷。结果问卷网后台回收了197份调查表,所有的受访者均受过口腔专业专科及以上的教育,口腔全科医师100份,口腔专科医师97份,56.0%的全科医师选择根折为最难诊治的牙外伤;22.0%的全科医师和19.6%的专科医师认为夹板固定的时间为10~14d,受访的50.8%的医师选择培训做为更新知识的途径,而32%选择互联网。结论厦门的口腔专科医师及全科医师对牙外伤的认知程度无差别,但都属于低认知程度;受过国家规范化培训与否对牙外伤的认知程度无差别;高年资的医师对新材料的认知优于低年资医师;培训班的方式是提高医师牙外伤认知水平的较好途径。
Objective To understand the cognition of dental trauma of the xiamen oral specialist and oral general practitioners. Methods A questionnaire survey about the knowledge of dental trauma was made through questionnaire net,and shared to xiamen oral physician We Chat group,within the group on the mouth of the practice in xiamen professional doctor to investigate questionnaire. Results 197 questionnaires were collected in the background of the questionnaire,and all of the respondents had received oral professional college or above education,which included 100 oral general practitioner and 97 oral specialist. 56. 0% of the general practitioners chose root fracture as the most difficult diagnosis and treatment of dental trauma,22. 2% of the general practitioners and 19. 6% of the specialists considered that the time for the splint was 10 to 14days;50. 8% of respondents chose training as a way to update knowledge,while 32% chose the Internet. Conclusion There is no difference in the degree of cognition between the oral specialist and general practitioner in Xiamen,but belong to low cognitive degree; national standardization trained or not is no difference on the degree of cognitive teeth trauma; High qualification of the physician's perception of the new material is better than that of low qualification. Training is a good way to improve the level of physician teeth trauma cognitive.
出处
《临床合理用药杂志》
2016年第28期35-36,共2页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词
口腔专业医师
调查
牙外伤
Oral specialist
Investigation
Dental trauma