摘要
目的探讨人Ⅱ型肺泡细胞表面抗原(KL-6)在类风湿关节炎(RA)并间质性肺炎与肺部感染中的鉴别诊断价值。方法选取常州市第二人民医院2013年7月—2014年12月收治的RA患者50例,根据疾病类型不同分为间质性肺炎组22例与肺部感染组28例,并选取本院同期健康体检者20例为健康对照组,以ELISA方法检测3组受检者血清KL-6水平并比较,分析KL-6对RA并间质性肺炎的鉴别诊断价值。结果间质性肺炎组患者KL-6水平高于肺部感染组、健康对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);肺部感染组与健康对照组KL-6水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。以KL-6≥500U/ml为标准,KL-6对RA并间质性肺炎的鉴别诊断灵敏度为90.9%,特异度为82.1%。以KL-6≥550U/ml为标准,KL-6对RA并间质性肺炎鉴别诊断的灵敏度为81.8%,特异度为92.8%。结论血清KL-6水平可有效鉴别诊断RA患者并间质性肺炎与肺部感染。
Objective To investigate the differential diagnostic value of type Ⅱ alveolar cell surface antigen( KL-6) in rheumatoid arthritis( RA) with interstitial pneumonia and pulmonary infection. Methods A total of 50 cases of RA patients were selected from July 2013 to December 2014 in Changzhou Second People’s Hospital,which were divided into interstitial pneumonia group( n = 22) and pulmonary infection group( n = 28) according to the different type of disease,20 cases of healthy people were selected during same period in our hospital as healthy control group. KL-6 level was tested and compared among the three groups,and differential diagnostic value of KL-6 and RA were analysed. Results KL-6 level of interstitial pneumonia group was higher than pulmonary infection group and healthy control group( P < 0. 05); no statistically significant differences was found in KL-6 level between pulmonary infection group and healthy control group( P > 0. 05). As for the standard of KL-6≥500U / ml,the differential diagnosis sensitivity of KL-6 to RA with interstitial pneumonia was 90. 9%,the specificity was 82. 1%. As for the standard of KL-6≥550U / ml,the differential diagnosis sensitivity of KL-6 to RA with interstitial pneumonia was 81. 8%,the specificity was 92. 8%. Conclusion Serum KL-6 level can effectively identify the patients with RA wiyh interstitial pneumonia and pulmonary infection.
出处
《临床合理用药杂志》
2016年第36期101-102,共2页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use
关键词
关节炎
类风湿
KL-6
肺疾病
间质性
诊断
鉴别
Arthritis
rheumatoid
KL-6
Lung diseases
interstitial
Diagnosis
differential