期刊文献+

头孢呋辛酯 头孢他美酯治疗急性细菌性感染 被引量:1

Comparison of Effect of Treating Acute Bacterial Infection by Orally Taking Cefuroxime Axetil and Cefetamet Pivoxil
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 比较头孢呋辛酯与头孢他美酯治疗急性细菌性感染的安全性。 方法 119例患者随机分成两组 ,头孢呋辛酯组 6 0例 ,用头孢呋辛酯 0 2 5 g ,口服 ,一日两次 ;头孢他美酯组 5 9例 ,用头孢他美酯 0 2 5 g,口服 ,一日两次 ,疗程均为 7~ 14d。 结果 两组临床总有效率分别为 96 %、95 % ,细菌清除率分别为 95 %、95 % ,不良反应发生率分别为 6 %、5 %。 结论 头孢呋辛酯与头孢他美酯治疗急性细菌性感染安全。 Objective Purpose:To compare the safety to treat acute bacterial infection by taking Cefuroxime Axetil and Cefetamet Pivoxil.Methods 119 patients were divided into two groups.The first group included 60 patients who orally took 0.25% of Cefuroxime Axetil twice per day;while the second group included 59 patients who orally took 0.25% of Cefetameet Pivoxil twice per day.The treatment period for both groups was 7-14 days.Results the overall clinical effective rate in both group was 96% and 95% respectively ,the baceteria clearance rate was same,saying 95%,and the negative side effect rate was 6% and 5% respectively.Conclusion Axetil and Cefetamet Pivoxil are safe and effective in treating acute bacterial infection.
出处 《医药论坛杂志》 2003年第12期4-5,共2页 Journal of Medical Forum
关键词 头孢呋辛酯 头孢他美酯 治疗 急性细菌性感染 Cefuroxime Axetil Cefetamet Pivoxil bacterial infection effective rate clearance rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1王睿 吴树荣.临床抗菌治疗手册[M].人民军医出版社,1997,3.115.
  • 2Cullmann W, Edwards DJ, Kissling M, Kneer J, Stoeckel K, Urwyler H. Cefetamet pivoil: a review of its microbiology,toxicology, pharmaco kinetics and clinical efficacy. Int Antimicrob Agents,1992,175-192.

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部