期刊文献+

谈判中构造效用函数的联合分析法 被引量:1

Conjoint Analysis Approach to Construction of Utility Functions in Negotiation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在谈判分析过程中经常需要利用效用函数对报盘和还盘进行评价 ,因此效用函数直接影响到谈判解的精确性。当谈判方案涉及的议题和议题选项较多时 ,谈判者往往很难在众多的方案之间作出明确判断 ,并且需要对谈判对方提出的难以预见的方案进行迅速评价并作出反应。本文引入联合分析与正交设计相结合的方法 ,利用联合分析将方案的所有议题及其选项通盘考虑 ,利用正交设计将这些议题与选项进行组合 ,生成一系列数量较少的虚拟方案 。 The conduct of negotiation analysis involves support for offer and counter offer evaluation by means of ratings based on the utility function which directly influences the final solution of the negotiation. In most cases, the number of package is a very large number and we need some way of selectively presenting just a few packages for the user to rate, yet obtain reliable utility values. This paper introduces conjoint analysis combined with orthogonal design to construct a utility function. Using conjoint analysis, the total utility of a package is decomposed into constituent option utilities. The orthogonal design is one of the most compact and effective designs that minimizes the number of packages to be evaluated by users, while still giving a good picture of the users preferences.
出处 《天津商学院学报》 2003年第4期34-37,共4页 Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
关键词 效用函数 联合分析法 正交设计 商业谈判 negotiation utility function conjoint analysis orthogonal design
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Rangaswamy A, Shell R G. Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an Electronic Bargaining Table[J]. Management Science, 1997, 43 (8) : 1147 - 1163.
  • 2Kersten E G, Noronha J S. WWW-based Negotiation Support:Design, Implementation, and Use [ J ]. Decision Support Systems,1999, 25 (2) : 135 - 154.
  • 3Green P E, Srinivasan V. Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook [ J]. Consumer Research, 1978, 5(2): 103- 123. 引自:文献[1].
  • 4Green P E, Krieger M A. Conjoint Analysis with Product Positioning Applications[ A ]. In: Eliashberg J, Lilien L G. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science[ Z]. Amsterdam,Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1993. 467 -515. 引自:文献[1].

同被引文献24

  • 1张少魁,王黎明.协商Agent的历史学习算法研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2005,41(12):44-46. 被引量:4
  • 2卢武昌,胡山立.基于神经网络的Agent电子商务协商模型[J].计算机应用,2005,25(7):1638-1640. 被引量:11
  • 3曾子明,孟波.基于MAS的电子商务谈判支持系统[J].计算机工程,2005,31(14):1-3. 被引量:9
  • 4Sung ho ha,Sang chan Park.Matching Buyers and Suppliers:An Intelligent Dynamic Exchange Model.IEEE Intelligent Systems,2001,16(4)
  • 5Wei Shang,Yijun Li,Wenjun Sun.A Practical Web-based NSS Framework for E-Business Negotiation.Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,2005
  • 6Mokdong Chung,Vasant Honavar.A Negotiation Model in Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce,Proceedings.International Symposium on 11-13 Dec,2000
  • 7Mihai Barbuceanu,Wai-Kau Lo.A Multi-attribute Utility Theoretic Negotiation for Electronic Commerce.Proceedings of the 4th Internal Conference on Autonomous Agents,Barcelona.Spain,2000.
  • 8Zhuang yan,Simon Fong,Shi Meilin.Negotiation Paradigms Based on Konwledge Bead's Methodology.Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Cyberworlds,2003
  • 9Zhou zhi,Jinliang Wei,Deng Qiangang.A Fuzzy Multi-objective Decision-making Method for Agent-based Negotiation.Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering,2003
  • 10Hasan Al-Sakran,Irina Serguievskaia.A Framework for Developing Experience Based e-negotiation System.Journal of ComputerScience,2006;2(2)

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部