2Brown ED, Chen MY, Wolfman NT. Complicatiom of renal transphntation: evaluation with US and radionuclide imaging.Podiographics, 2000, 20 (3): 607-622.
3Giovagnorio F, Ballesio L. A statistical evaluation of the variability in the measurements of the resistive index in kidney transplantation. Radiol Med(Torino), 2000, 99 (3): 174-176.
4Kew CE, Lopez BR, Smith JK. Postransplant lymphoproliferative disorder localized near the allograft in renal transplantation.Transplantation, 2000, 69 (5): 809-814.
5Chudon M, Kessler M, Champigneulle J. Lymphoproliferative disorders after renal transplantation: role of medical imaging.Eur Radiol, 1998, 8 (9): 1686-1693.
6Arson J, Allison J. New technology show promise of improving the Doppler imaging. Med Imaging lnt, 1994, 9: 16.
7Turetschek K, Nassl C, Wunderbaldinger P, et al. Power Doppler versus color Doppler imaging in renal allograft evaluation. J Ultrasound Med, 1996, 15 (7): 517.
8Sidhu MK, Gambhir S, Jeffrey RBJ. Power Doppler imaging of acute renal transphnt rejection. J Clin Ultrasound, 1999,27 (4): 171-175.
9Trillaud H, Merville P, Tran LLP. Color Doppler sonography in early renal transplantation follow-up: resistive index measuremerits versus power Doppler sonography. AJR, 1998, 171 (6):1611-1615.
10Hoyer PF, Schmid R, Wunsch L. Color Doppler energy-a new technique to study tissue perfusion in renal transplants.Pediatr Nephrol, 1999, 13 (7): 559-563.
10Ahmoud I, Basuni F, Sabry A, et al. Single - centre experi- ence with cyclosporin in 106 children with idiopathic focal segmental glomeruloselerosis [ J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2005,20 (4) :735 - 742.
