期刊文献+

国际刑事法院管辖权的属性 被引量:4

On the Manifold Nature of ICC
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自 1998年《国际刑事法院罗马规约》通过后 ,围绕管辖权属性问题的争辩始终没有休止。实际上 ,国际刑事法院管辖权的多维性体现了主权与人权国际保护的逻辑延伸。透视国际刑事法院管辖权内容上的多维性特征可见 ,《罗马规约》规定的国际刑事法院管辖权游弋于补充性和普遍性与强制性之间 ,体现了适用上的多角度、多层次和多维空间。这种多维特征之间既相互独立 ,又相辅相成 ,充分显示国际刑事法院的历史地位和重要性 ,当被控国际罪行的程序逐渐制度化时 ,国际刑事法院的运行机制也会更加公正。 The nature of ICC jurisdiction is continually debated since the Rome Statute of International Criminal Court was passed in 1998. In fact, the manifold jurisdiction of ICC embodies the logic extension of both human rights and sovereignty. Looking over the manifold jurisdiction of ICC, under the provision of ICC Statute, the ICC jurisdiction is hesitating among the nature of complementariness, universality and compulsion and shows different points and levels of jurisdiction when it is operated. These manifold jurisdictions are sometimes independent from each other, while sometimes supplements each other either, which fully reveals the historical status and importance of ICC. Mechanism of ICC will be more impartiality, rationality and perfection after the system o f prosecuting international crimes is gradually established.
作者 王秀梅 杜澎
出处 《现代法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第3期94-98,共5页 Modern Law Science
关键词 国际刑事法院 管辖权 《国际刑事法院罗马规约》 强制性 补充性 普遍性 complementariness universality compulsion multidimension
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1M. Cherif Bassiouni, “International Crimes and International Criminal Court”, presentation made by professor Bassiouni on May 12, 1999, in China.
  • 2Rupa Bhattacharyya: “Establishing a Rule - of- Law International Criminal Justice System”, Symposiun on Humanitarian Intervention and International Justice, at “Texas International Law Journal”, 1996.
  • 3Paul D. Marquardt:“Law Without Borders: The Constitutionality of an International Criminal Court”, at“ Columbia Journal of Transnational law”, 1995.
  • 4Sandra L. Jamison: “A Permanent International Criminal Court: A Proposal that Overcomes Past Objections”, at “Denver Journal of International law and Policy”, Spring, 1995.
  • 5Principle 1 - Fundamentals of Universal Jurisdiction, in “The Princeton Principles on Universal Jurisdiction and Commentary on the Princeton Principles”(Steering Committee ed. ), Program in Law and Public Affairs Princeton University New Jersey, 2001.
  • 6Sandra L. Jamison:“A Permanent International Criminal Court: A Proposal that Overcomes Past Objections”, at“Denver Journal of International Law and Policy”, Spring, 1995.
  • 7Michael Scharf: “The Jury is Still Out on the Need for an International Criminal Court”, Duke Journal of Comparative and lnternational Law,1991.
  • 8M. Cherif Bassiouni: “The Time Has Come For an International Criminal Court”载“Indiana International and Comparative Law Review”spring, 1991.
  • 9M. Chief Bassiouni & Christopher L. Blakesley: “The Need For an International Criminal Court in the New International World Order”, at “Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law”, 1992.
  • 10M. Chief Bassiouni & Christopher L. Blakesley: “The Need For an International Criminal Court in the New International World Order”, at“Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law”, 1992.

同被引文献54

引证文献4

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部