期刊文献+

试论WTO争端解决机制与国家主权的关系 被引量:1

On the Relation between Mechanism of Dispute Settlement and National Sovereignty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国“1994年主权大辩论”及其后续影响促使我们思考WTO争端解决机制与国家主权的关系。诚然,WTO争端解决机制对国家主权造成了一定的冲击,但是它没有,也不可能从根本上改变国家主权,不可能动摇国家主权原则在国际法中的基础地位。两者关系之争也表明:国家主权在新时期有新的表现形式,但不可能“淡化”或“消亡”;在相当长的时间内,国际组织与民族国家在主权的问题上的“斗争与较量”还将持续下去。 1994 great debate on sovereignty in the U. S and its follow-up effect impel us to ponder over the relation between the mechanism of dispute settlement in the WTO and national sovereignty. Truly, the mechanism of dispute settlemant in the WTO will give national sovereignty a certain shock but it will never alter national sovereignty and it is impossible to shake the fundamental status of the principle of national sovereignty in the international law. As also indicated by the debate on their relation, national sovereignty has new form of expression in the new period, but it is impossible to be faded out or extinct; ' struggle and contest of international organization and national states on the issue of sovereignty will last for a period of considerable length.
作者 刘勇
出处 《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2003年第2期50-57,共8页 Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
关键词 WTO 争端解决机制 国家 主权 World Trade Organization mechanism of dispute settlement state sovereignty
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[2][美]Scott Mcbride. Dispute Settlement In The WTO: Backbone Of The Global Trading System Or Delegation Of Awe some Power [J]. Law & Policy In International Business, 2001: 643 ~ 675.
  • 2[3][英]詹宁斯,瓦茨.奥本海国际法:第1卷第1分册[M].王铁崖.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1998.94.
  • 3[5]周鲠生.国际法[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
  • 4[6][美]U.S.Experience with WTO Dispute Settlement [J].The American Journal of International Law,2000:698.
  • 5潘惜唇.论GATT环保例外条款的适用条件和发展趋势[J].中国法学,2001(5):166-169. 被引量:16
  • 6[11][美]James Cameron&Kevin R.Gray.Principle of international Lawinthe WTO Dispute Settlement Body [J].International and Gomparative Law Quarterly. 2001: 295.
  • 7[12][美]Rutsel Silverstre J.Martha.World Trade Dispute Settlement and the Exhaustion of Local Remedies Rule[J].Journal of World Trade, 1996: 123.
  • 8余盛兴,龚柏华.WTO关于美日热轧钢反倾销争端案述评[J].法律适用(国家法官学院学报),2001(11):12-15. 被引量:1
  • 9[15]The Report of Appellate Body on Japan- Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, WT/DS8/AB/R, p, 15, available at http: //www. wto. org.
  • 10[16][美]Gray N.Horlick.WTO Dispute Settlement andthe Dole Conmmission[J]. Journal of WorldTrade,1995:45

二级参考文献13

  • 1Report of the Panel, United States - Antidumping Measures on Certain Hot-rolled Steel Products from Japan, see: http://www. wto. org.
  • 2Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value:Hot - Rolled Flat - Rolled Carbon - Quality Steel Products From Japan, 64 Fed. Reg. 24329, 24370 (6 May 1999) (" USDOC Final Dumping Determination" ).
  • 3《关税与贸易总协定》第10条第3款
  • 4《反倾销协议》第2条、第6条、第9条、第10条和附件2
  • 5《反倾销协议》第3条,第4条
  • 6《反倾销协议》第18条第4款
  • 7《反倾销协议》第3条第5款.
  • 8Report of the Appellate Body, Standards For Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, WT/DS2/AB/R,para. 6. 26.
  • 9Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS58/AB/R, para. 173.
  • 10Report of the GATT Panel, U. S - Restrictions on Imports of Tuna(1994), para. 6. 1.

共引文献19

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部