期刊文献+

开放式的自主发展:对英国国际关系理论的一项观察——思考中国国际关系理论的方向 被引量:9

Open and Independent Development:An Observation on International Relations Theories in the United Kingdom——Thoughts on the Direction of International Relations Theories in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 英国国际关系理论具有不同于美国国际关系理论的许多特点。国际关系理论的英国特性也许就是开放式的自主发展 ,充当国际关系知识的一间“世界工厂”。所谓开放 ,在其主要意义上是指 ,在与美国一起分享共性的“盎格鲁———美利坚知识传统”的同时 ,英国又把自己定位为欧洲国际关系理论共同体的重要组成部分。所谓自主发展 ,是指英国国际关系理论在上百年的发展中并不依附于作为一门“美国社会科学的国际关系理论”。国际社会学与国际政治经济学一直是英国国际关系理论的两个“名牌” ,在世界上独树一帜。许多英国学者更倾向于国际关系 (国际政治经济学 )批评理论。多元主义与学术民主色彩明显。不要求学者服从于某种整齐划一的占主导地位的“科学”理论 ,比美国同行更有可能。 British theories of international relations (IR) are different from those in the United States.British theories,characterized self-determined development,became an open'world factory of knowledge'about international relations.They are open in terms that they share the Anglo American tradition.At the same time,Great Britain positioned itself as an important part of European IR theory.They developed in a self determined fashion in that the development over the past 100 years was not against the backdrop of American social science.There are two strands in British IR theory:international sociology and international political economy.These are unique in the world.Many British scholars prefer to follow the'international relations critique,'which is a deconstruction of the orthodox IR theory.Compared to mainstream IR theory in the United States,which is characterized by rational choice and empiricism and state centralism,IR theory in Britain is characterized by pluralism and democracy.Scholars in Great Britain are never pushed to follow a unified theory.This means that scholars in Great Britain,compared to those in America, have more possibilities and are more qualified to respond to the many challenges and problems that have been emerging with globalization. Some theorists in Great Britain have been seeking to penetrate IR theory into broader research on society,politics,culture,anthropology,philosophy,and even literature.This kind of IR theory is gradually growing in opposition to the orthodox principles.It is worthy of the attention of Chinese colleagues in this field.
作者 庞中英
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第6期20-25,共6页 World Economics and Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献63

  • 12000年9月10日,日本《每日新闻》
  • 2For a good recent account of the literature on globalisstion and the state,aee Hobson,J.and Ramesh.M.(2002)Globalisstion Makea of States What States Make of It:Between Agency and Structure in the State/Globalisstion Debate'New Political Economy,7(1):2002:5-22
  • 3Payne,A.and Gamble,A(1996)Introduction:The Political Economy of Region alism and World Order'in A.Gamble and A.Payne(eds),.Regionalism and World Order.Basingstoke:Macmillan:1-20.
  • 4Ohmae,K(1995),The End of the Nation State.London:Harper Collins.
  • 5Breslin,S(2000)Decentralisation,Globalisation and China's Partial Re-engagement with the Global Economy'New Political Economy,5(2):205-226.
  • 6For a recent examople,see,Geeraerts.G.and Men Jing(2001),International Relations Theory in China,Global Society,15(3):251-276.
  • 7Zhang Yongjin(2000),The English School in China:A Stary Of How Ideas Travel And Are Transplanted Department of Intemational Relstions RSPAS,ANU:Working Paper No.2000/4
  • 8Knudsen argues that both Ruggie and Wendt'accept more of less implicitly the main tenets of realism,and that the gap between a social constructivist reading of intemation al politics and mainstream traditionalism seems smaller than the argumentative rhetoric would lead us to expect……I have very little problem with anything set forth by either Ruggie or Wendt in these two solid books.except that the specifications they advocate seem to add little of consequence to the theories they want to improve.See,Knudsen,O(2001),Transcending a Fruitless Debate:Towards a Delimitation of Competing Paradigms.http://www.sh.se4/statsvetenskap/files/kmudsen.doc.
  • 9Song Xinning(2001),Building Intemational Relations Theory with Chinese Characteristics;Joumal of Contemporary China 10(26):61-74.p.71
  • 10Zhu Wenli(2001),Intemational Political Economy from a Chinese Angle.Journal of Contemporary China,10(26):45-54.

共引文献6

同被引文献248

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部