两种不同途径中心静脉置管的效果比较

Comparison of results of two routes of central venous catheterization

目的 :探讨常规途径中心静脉置管与经周围静脉中心静脉置管的优缺点。 方法 :按照不同途径中心静脉置管将病人分成两组 ,即NICC组 (常规途径中心静脉置管组 )和PICC组 (经周围静脉中心静脉置管组 )。比较第一穿刺部位穿刺成功率、穿刺所需时间、病人不适度、穿刺并发症及导管感染发生率。 结果 :PICC组与NICC组相比 ,穿刺成功率高 ,所需时间短 ,并发症发生率低。但导管感染发生率较高 ,穿刺部位局部刺激症状较重。 结论 :①PICC法操作简单、安全 ,并发症少。②PICC法易合并导管感染。严格无菌操作、定时更换导管、加强导管口的护理具有重要意义。③PICC法置管时 。

Objectives:To compare the advantage and the disadvantage between the normally inserted central venous catheter(NICC) and the peripherally inserted central venous catheter(PICC). Methods:The patients were divided into two groups by different insertion methods:NICC group and PICC group.The success rate of first insertion point,the time of insertion, the symptom of patients during insertion, the complication of insertion and the rate of catheter septicemia were compared. Results:The group of PICC had a higher rate of successful insertion, a less time of insertion, a less time of insertion, a lower rate of complication, but a higher rate of catheter septicemia,when compared with the group of NICC. Conclusions:①PICC have some advantages being simple in insertion and of less complications.②The PICC patients have more chances to suffer from the catheter septicemia.③Perepheral venous inflammation and veno-occlusion more earily occurr in PICC patients.