期刊文献+

大数据时代中美高校数据素养教育比较研究 被引量:33

Comparative Study of Data Literacy Education in Chinese and American Universities in the Big Data Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的/意义]通过对大数据时代中美高校数据素养教育开展情况的比较分析,旨在推动我国高校大学生数据素养教育,培养符合数据时代要求的人才。[方法/过程]运用文献收集、网络调研和比较分析的研究方法,选择美国和中国的三所高校为研究样本,从数据素养教育的四个方面——教学目标、教学内容、教学方式和教学评价体系进行讨论,分析大数据时代背景下两国高校开展数据素养教育的特点与差异,为大数据环境下我国高校的数据素养教育提供相关建议。[结果/结论]与美国相比,我国数据素养教育还处于萌芽和发展阶段。在教学目标方面,国内高校应顺应大数据时代背景,针对不同群体制定层次化目标。在教学内容方面,国内高校应加强对数据安全和数据伦理道德的培养,关注学科专业特色并开展有针对性的教学。在教学方式方面,国内高校应与其他机构开展多元合作,创新数据素养培养模式。在教学评价体系方面,国内高校应重视课程评估与反馈,建立健全数据素养教育评价体系。 [Purpose/significance]This paper aims to promote the data literacy education of college students in China and cultivate talents in line with the requirements of the data environment by making comparison between Chinese and American universities.[Method/process]Using the method of literature collection,online research and comparative analysis,three universities in China and America are selected as research samples to conduct a comparative discussion on the teaching goal,teaching material,teaching methods and teaching evaluation system.This paper analyzes the characteristics and differences of data literacy education between two countries under the big data environment and offer suggestions for the data literacy education in Chinese universities.[Result/conclusion]Compared with America,the data literacy education in China is still emerging and developing.In terms of teaching goal,domestic universities should comply with big data environment and set hierarchical goals for different groups.In terms of teaching material,schools should strengthen the education of data security and information ethics,focus on specialty characteristics and carry out targeted teaching.In terms of teaching methods,diversified cooperation with other institutions are needed to innovate data literacy training models.In terms of teaching evaluation system,it is essential to attach importance to course evaluation and feedback,then establish and improve the data literacy education evaluation system.
作者 张长亮 王晨晓 李竟彤 Zhang Changliang
出处 《情报理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2019年第8期131-137,共7页 Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金 吉林省教育科学“十三五”规划项目“新媒体环境下高校学生网络社群信息行为研究”的成果之一,项目编号:GH170010
关键词 大数据 数据素养教育 中国 美国 高校 比较研究 big data data literacy education China USA university comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

二级参考文献292

  • 1王迎红.论学科馆员的设置及其培养[J].图书馆,2006(1):77-79. 被引量:49
  • 2李金昌.论统计素养[J].浙江统计,2006(1):4-6. 被引量:19
  • 3张薇.英语数字素养的研究型评价模式[J].外语教学与研究,2006,38(2):115-121. 被引量:29
  • 4肖俊洪.数字素养[J].中国远程教育,2006(05S):32-33. 被引量:113
  • 5HEYT,TANSLEYS,TOLLEk第四范式:数据密集型科学发现[M].潘教峰,张晓林,等,译.北京:科学出版社,2012:197-203.
  • 6Steele B, Kili.-Bahi S. Quantitative Literacy Across the Curriculum: A Case Study [J]. Numeracy, 2008, 1 (2), Article 3.
  • 7Steen L. A. Educational Goals for Quantitative Literacy. [EB/OL]. [2014-03-29 ]. http ://www. in. gov/che/ files/Ed_goals for_QLpdf.
  • 8ACRL. Information literacy standards for anthropology and sociology students [EB/OL]. [2014-03-29]. http: //www.ala.org/acrl/standards/anthro soc standards.
  • 9Prewitt K. The statistical literacy challenge: an introduction to Of Significance [J]. Of Significance: A Topical Journal of the Association of Public Data Users, 1999, 1 (1): 1-2.
  • 10Treadwell W. Introduction to statistical literacy[J]. Of Significance: A Topical Journal of the Association of PublicDataUsers, 1999, 1 (1): 5-7.

共引文献552

同被引文献409

引证文献33

二级引证文献174

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部