期刊文献+

舰艇军人创造性思维水平与应对方式调查 被引量:1

Investigation on creativity cognition level and coping way of warship armymen
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的调查军人创造性思维水平与应对方式,为提高智力水平提供参考依据。方法对341名军人,选用《威廉斯创造力思考活动》测验取得创造性思维平均值,将创造性思维水平总分大于或等于总均值加上一个标准差者划分为高创造性思维水平(A组);创造性思维水平总分小于或等于总均值减去一个标准差者划分为低创造性思维水平(B组);根据肖计划编制的应对方式量表,予以修订为21道题测查,采用五点计分后按A、B组比较。结果创造性思维水平分布:A组15.8%(54/341),B组15%(51/341)。A组在解决问题的应对方式上得分显著高于B组,在退避、幻想、自责、求助、合理化应对方式上显著低于B组。结论思维和情绪同时竞争认知资源时,创造性思维水平下降,影响应对方式,情绪起引导作用。 Objective Through survey of military personnel level of creative thinking and coping way,to provide reference for improving intelligence.Methods By using Williams Creativity Thinking Activities Test creative thinking average value of 341 soldiers was obtained.Who having creative thinking level total ratings ≥total average value plus a standard difference were divided into high creative thinking level group(group A),who less or equal that minus a standard difference into low creative thinking level group(group B);according to Shaw plans prepared coping way scale 21 problems for testing were taken,after scoring five points group A and B were compared each with other.Results Horizontal distribution of creative thinking levels:group A was 15.8%(54/341),group B was 15%(51/341);group A in the problem-solving coping way scored-rating was significantly higher than group B,but in avoidance,fantasy,blame,for help,the rationalization coping way was significantly lower than group B.Conclusion The thinking and the emotion at the same time compete cognitive resources,levels of creative thinking reduce,so that influence coping ways,emotion plays a lead role.
出处 《实用医药杂志》 2016年第1期3-4,共2页 Practical Journal of Medicine & Pharmacy
基金 军队心理卫生科研专项课题<心理应激无创性快速检测仪>(12XLZ211)
关键词 舰艇军人 创造性思维 应对方式 Warship armymen Creativity cognition Coping style
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Vasterling Jennifer J,Proctor Susan P,Amoroso Paul,Kane Robert,Heeren Timothy,White Roberta F.Neuropsychological outcomes of army personnel following deployment to the Iraq war. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association . 2006
  • 2王丽杰,吴志颖,李瑾,崔婧,郭晓蕾.“模拟式启发”训练对维和军人思维形式和情绪状态的影响[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2013,21(6):852-854. 被引量:6
  • 3王丽杰,王伟,吴志颖,付晓丽,朱媛.军人情绪状态与创造性思维水平的测验[J].实用医药杂志,2015,32(1):63-66. 被引量:1
  • 4Taylor M,Miller A,Mills L,et al.Predictors of success in Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL (BUD/S)training.Part I.What do we know and where do we go from here?. Naval Health Research Center Technical Document No. 06-37 .
  • 5Martinussen M.Psychological measures as predictors of pilot performance: a meta-analysis. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology . 1996

二级参考文献20

  • 1卿素兰,罗杰.大学生后悔心理调查[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(12):810-810. 被引量:8
  • 2沈渔邮.精神病学[M].第3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1995:574.
  • 3林幸台,王木荣.威廉斯创造性思考活动手册[M].台湾:心理出版社,1997,1.
  • 4Maruff P, Snyder P, McStephen M,et al. Cognitive deterioration as- sociated with an expedition in an extreme desert environment [J]. British Journal of Sports Medeine, 2006,40 (6) : 556- 560.
  • 5Decety J, Ingvar D H. Brain structures participating in mental simula- tion of motor behavior:A neuropsyehologieal Interpretation[J]. Ac- tion Psychology 1990,73 : 13-24.
  • 6Hesslow G. Conscious thought as simulation of behavior and pereep-tion[J]. Trends Cognitive Science, 2002,6 : 242-247.
  • 7Dalgleish T. What might not have been:An investigation of the na- ture of counterfactual thinking in survivors of trauma[J]. Psychol Med,2004,34(7) :1215-1225.
  • 8Roese N J,Olson J M. Counterfactual thinking:A critical overview. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates[M]. Inc. Mahwah, New Jersey, 1995: 1-55.
  • 9严进,路长林,刘振全,现代应激理论[M].北京.科学出版社,2007:90-94,20-26.106-115.
  • 10Goleman D. Emotional intelligence[M]. New York:Bantanl Books,1995. 36.

共引文献5

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部