期刊文献+

刑事法庭调查中的填表式问句初探 被引量:4

Form-filling Questions in Chinese Criminal Court Examinations
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于对真实庭审语料的会话分析 ,探讨了刑事法庭庭审调查中一种特殊的疑问表达形式———填表式问句的语法特点及其蕴含的功能意义。这种问句的结构形式是“NP+,K”(名词组 +降调 ) ,与特指问句对应 ,但其语义功能属于只问不疑。“填表式问句”并不是一种常规的问句形式 ,其询问功能取决于一定的话轮位置和序列语境 ;另一方面 ,“填表式问句”本身也反映了特定言语情境中交际双方不平等的权力关系 ,故而加强了庭审调查会话交际情境的机构性特点。 Based on a 70-minute naturally-occurring video-taped database collected in Chinese criminal court examinations, this paper examines the grammatical form and pragmatic function of form-filling questions, as well as the role of conversational sequence and communicative situation in the use of such questions. The analysis of the data follows the conversational analytical approach, according to which speakers construct utterances in such a way that their discourse functions can be recognized by the specific addressee. Recipients respond to utterances on the basis of what they interpret them as doing. Many instances are found in our data where a grammatical NP said in a falling intonation does questioning by virtue of its sequential position in the talk. The recipients in the interaction had no trouble interpreting the declarative as questions, though there is neither interrogative form nor interrogative intonation. This study suggests that, on the one hand, in certain communicative situations, the significance of sequential organization may override syntactic and intonational forms in determining utterances as doing questioning, thus providing a new perspective on our understanding of questions; and on the other hand, the situated use of form-filling questions may also reinforce the institutional character of communicative situations such as criminal court examination by reflecting the asymmetric relation between interactants.
作者 高华
出处 《语言教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第4期37-44,共8页 Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies
关键词 刑事庭审调查 填表式问句 语法特点 语义功能 结构形式 汉语 语境 会话分析 form-filling questions criminal court examination conversation analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Hutchby, I. & R. Wooffitt 1998 Conversation Analvsis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 2Hymes 1972 Models of the Interaction of Language and Social life. In Gumperz, J & Hymes, D. (eds.) Directions in Sociolinguistics : the Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston: 35--71.
  • 3Sacks, H. , Sehegloff, E. & G. Jefferson 1974 A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking in Conversation. Language 50: 696--735.
  • 4Atkinson, J. M. & Drew, P. 1979 Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.
  • 5Atkinson, J. M. & J. C. Heritage (eds.) 1984 Structures o f Social Action : Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Chao, Yuen-Ren (赵元任) 1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • 7Grice, H.P. 1975 Logic and Conversation. InCole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics , Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press: 41--58.
  • 8Gumperz, J. 1982 Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

同被引文献32

引证文献4

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部