摘要
集团化办学是教育治理体系现代化的可行路径之一,对集团化办学的成效进行相对有效的评估具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。研究通过问卷调查法、访谈法、探索性因子分析等方法对上海市J区三大单一法人式集团进行成效评估。研究发现:整体而言,集团化办学学生的综合素质得到提升;集团化办学品质有所改善,一定程度上促进了区域教育的优质均衡发展。但同时,当前集团化办学也存在问题与挑战,一是母体学校直接将校园文化复制给成员校,集团内各校办学特色不突出;二是集团化办学缺乏持续发展的内在动力。在此基础上,研究结合上海市J区单法人式集团化办学的发展现状,从平衡办学风格的统一与差异、建立健全现代学校制度方面提出了针对性建议。
Collectivization of schools is one of the feasible paths for the modernization of educational governance system.It is of great theoretical and practical significance to evaluate the effectiveness of educational collectivization.Through questionnaire surveys,interviews,and exploratory factor analysis,this study evaluates the effectiveness of three single-legal-person educational groups in Shanghai J district.It is found that:the overall quality of students in group-based schools has been developed;the level of teachers has improved;and the quality of educational collectivization has improved.At the same time,there are also problems and challenges to educational collectivization.First,the member schools directly copies the campus culture from the parent school,and therefore do not have unique characteristics.Second,the elite schools lacked internal motivation for sustained development.Third,teacher training and administrative management are under pressure.Based on these findings,this study proposes recommendations from three aspects:balancing consistence and uniqueness in educational styles of schools in the same group,establishing and improving modern school system,and continuously promoting the development of the teachers’team.
作者
张万朋
程钰琳
ZHANG Wan-peng;CHENG Yu-lin(Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai,200062;Hongqiaoshangwuqu Sub-Branch,Industrial Bank of China,Shanghai,201106)
出处
《清华大学教育研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第4期113-122,共10页
Tsinghua Journal of Education
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“当前主要国家和地区财政教育经费和全社会教育经费投入比较研究”(17JZD060)
中央高校基本科研业务费项目华东师范大学青年预研究项目“学区化集团化办学推进义务教育优质均衡发展的实证研究”(2017ECNU——KXK028)
2017年度上海市哲学社会科学规划教育学一般项目“学校班级规模对教育公平的影响研究”(A1711)
关键词
集团化办学
成效评估
单一法人式教育集团
educational collectivization
effectiveness evaluation
Single-Legal-Person educational groups