期刊文献+

网络预约出租车本地牌照和户籍限制的审查与规制 被引量:3

Review andRegulation of Local Licenseand Household Registration Restrictionsfor Online Car - hailing Service
原文传递
导出
摘要 个人对其所有的私家车执行'收益'权能,符合物权法基本原则中'发挥物效用'的规定,私家车入市营运成为可能。网约车运营服务具有极强的社会关联性,一定的监管和规则成为必要。网约车本地牌照和户籍限制的措施,是对个人财产所有权中'收益'权能的减损,需要审查其合法性与正当性。对网约车本地牌照和户籍限制,违反了许可法中有关许可事项与权限的规定,也对劳动法和就业促进法中'平等就业和选择职业'条款提出挑战,是对法律优先原则的冒犯。治理城市病不构成限制网约车外地牌照和户籍的正当根据,违反法律保留原则。在安全有关的各式变量中,本地牌照和户籍并不是一项重要内容,本地牌照和户籍限制网约车司机属于考虑了与安全不相关的因素,违反了公平和公正原则。比例原则审查方面,本地牌照和户籍限制网约车手段并不能达到'规范网络预约出租汽车经营服务行为'与'保障运营安全和乘客合法权益'的目的,并且在多种监管手段中还存在其他对网约车造成限制更小的手段,网约车司机本地牌照和户籍限制的措施存在不当之虞。 It is possible for private cars to operate on the basis of the"benefit" of all their private cars, and in accordance with Mexerting the utilityof thingsM in the Law of Real Right. The Operation service of the network carhas a strong social relevance, certain regulation and rules become necessary.The local license and household registration is a derogation from the power ofMincome" in the ownership of personal property, which needs to be examinedfor its legality and legitimacy. The restrictions on local licenses and householdregistration of online car-hailing service are in violation of the licensing itemsand authority in the Licensing Law, and it also challenges the “equalemployment and choice of occupations” clause in the Labor and EmploymentPromotion Act, it is an offense against the principle of legal priority.Governance of urban disease is not a legitimate basis for restricting the licenseand household registration of online car-hailing service, and it violates theprinciple of legal reservation.In the various variables related to security, Local licenses and householdregistration are not an important element, therefore, the use of local licenses andhousehold registration to restrict the driver of online car-hailing service isconsidered a safety-related factor. In terms of review of the proportionalityprinciple, Local licensing and household registration restrictions cannot meet thepurpose of u standardizing the behavior of online car-hailing service " andensuring the safety of operation and passenger rights and interests, cannotachieve the purpose of H standardizing the operation and operation of the taxiserviceand w safeguarding the operation and the legitimate rights and interestsof passengers”. And there are less restrictive means among a variety ofregulatory means. So, there is something wrong of local license and householdregistration restrictions.
作者 殷守革
出处 《清华知识产权评论》 2017年第1期246-261,共16页 Tsinghua Intellectual Property Review
基金 国家社科基金2014年重点项目(第三批)《行政民主进程中的法治政府建设理论与实践创新研究》(项目号:14AZD141)
关键词 网约车 户籍限制 不相关的因素 法律优先 法律保留 比例原则 Online Car-hailing Service Household Registration Restrictions Unrelated Factors Legal Reservations Principle of Proportionality
  • 相关文献

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部