摘要
个人对其所有的私家车执行'收益'权能,符合物权法基本原则中'发挥物效用'的规定,私家车入市营运成为可能。网约车运营服务具有极强的社会关联性,一定的监管和规则成为必要。网约车本地牌照和户籍限制的措施,是对个人财产所有权中'收益'权能的减损,需要审查其合法性与正当性。对网约车本地牌照和户籍限制,违反了许可法中有关许可事项与权限的规定,也对劳动法和就业促进法中'平等就业和选择职业'条款提出挑战,是对法律优先原则的冒犯。治理城市病不构成限制网约车外地牌照和户籍的正当根据,违反法律保留原则。在安全有关的各式变量中,本地牌照和户籍并不是一项重要内容,本地牌照和户籍限制网约车司机属于考虑了与安全不相关的因素,违反了公平和公正原则。比例原则审查方面,本地牌照和户籍限制网约车手段并不能达到'规范网络预约出租汽车经营服务行为'与'保障运营安全和乘客合法权益'的目的,并且在多种监管手段中还存在其他对网约车造成限制更小的手段,网约车司机本地牌照和户籍限制的措施存在不当之虞。
It is possible for private cars to operate on the basis of the"benefit" of all their private cars, and in accordance with Mexerting the utilityof thingsM in the Law of Real Right. The Operation service of the network carhas a strong social relevance, certain regulation and rules become necessary.The local license and household registration is a derogation from the power ofMincome" in the ownership of personal property, which needs to be examinedfor its legality and legitimacy. The restrictions on local licenses and householdregistration of online car-hailing service are in violation of the licensing itemsand authority in the Licensing Law, and it also challenges the “equalemployment and choice of occupations” clause in the Labor and EmploymentPromotion Act, it is an offense against the principle of legal priority.Governance of urban disease is not a legitimate basis for restricting the licenseand household registration of online car-hailing service, and it violates theprinciple of legal reservation.In the various variables related to security, Local licenses and householdregistration are not an important element, therefore, the use of local licenses andhousehold registration to restrict the driver of online car-hailing service isconsidered a safety-related factor. In terms of review of the proportionalityprinciple, Local licensing and household registration restrictions cannot meet thepurpose of u standardizing the behavior of online car-hailing service " andensuring the safety of operation and passenger rights and interests, cannotachieve the purpose of H standardizing the operation and operation of the taxiserviceand w safeguarding the operation and the legitimate rights and interestsof passengers”. And there are less restrictive means among a variety ofregulatory means. So, there is something wrong of local license and householdregistration restrictions.
出处
《清华知识产权评论》
2017年第1期246-261,共16页
Tsinghua Intellectual Property Review
基金
国家社科基金2014年重点项目(第三批)《行政民主进程中的法治政府建设理论与实践创新研究》(项目号:14AZD141)
关键词
网约车
户籍限制
不相关的因素
法律优先
法律保留
比例原则
Online Car-hailing Service
Household Registration Restrictions
Unrelated Factors
Legal Reservations
Principle of Proportionality