论传统"现当代文学史"分期理论的逻辑缺失

On the Lack of Logic to the Traditional Periodicalization Theory of the Modern and Contemporary History of Literature

重写文学史已是当代中国文学史家们的理论责任与审美自觉。当20世纪中国文学走完它的全程之时,传统的"现当代文学史"的分期理论与叙写方式的不足与缺点便日益突显出来。然而,只要我们对传统的现当代文学史从"整体性"、"逻辑性"、"文化动因"及"审美自由"等方面的缺失进行全面的考察,便能从理论的反面探寻出重写"20世纪中国文学史"的必要性与理论支点。

Rewriting the history of literature is the theoretical responsibility and aesthetic consciousness of the modern and contemporary historins of Chinese literature. When the Chinese literature of the twentieth century comes to an end, the shortcomings and insufficiency of the traditionel periodical and narrative ways have gradually appeared. From the opposite of the loss of 'integral', 'logic', 'culture motive', 'aesthetic freedom', the necessity and theoretical support of rewriting the history of it has been the focus of theoretical circle.