期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆囊切除术不同麻醉方式选择的比较研究 被引量:8

Comparison of method choices in different anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较气管内插管下全凭静脉麻醉与吸入七氟醚静吸复合麻醉在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的麻醉应用效果及经济学分析。方法择期行腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者40例,随机分为两组,均使用丙泊酚、舒芬太尼、顺式阿曲库铵行麻醉诱导,Ⅰ组靶控输注(TCI)丙泊酚维持,Ⅱ组吸入七氟醚维持,术中按需追加舒芬太尼、顺式阿曲库铵维持镇痛与肌松。术中不同时点观察记录麻醉效果,术毕记录麻醉药品消耗量,比较分析两组的麻醉效果及经济学分析。结果两组患者麻醉时间、术中麻醉监控各指数均无统计学差异,麻醉术后并发症Ⅰ组显著低于Ⅱ组,而麻醉用药费用Ⅰ组显著高于Ⅱ组(502.4±81.2 vs.441.0±99.3元,P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,全凭静脉TCI丙泊酚维持麻醉安全可控,有较少的麻醉并发症,但比吸入七氟醚静吸复合麻醉的麻醉用药费用更高。 Objective To compare the anesthesia drug costs in anesthesia endotracheal intubation total intravenous with sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery .Methods Forty patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into two groups equally , with n=20 in each group.All patients were induced by propofol , sufentanil and cis-atracurium, group I received target controlled infusion ( TCI) of propofol to maintain , group II received sevoflurane to maintain .sufentanil and cis-atracurium was provided to maintain analgesia and muscle relaxation during the operation .Sedation depth was monitored by the anesthesia depth index (Narcotrend index, NI), and the NI was set in D grade.Anesthetic consumption and calculate drug costs was recorded and compared based on various narcotics unit .Results There was no significant difference in the patients demographic , anesthesia time and operation time .The drug cost was (502.4 ±81.2 Yuan, 5.9 ±1.0 Yuan/min) and (441.0 ±99.3 Yuan, 5.4 ±0.8 Yuan/min) in group I and group II, respectively.Group I was higher than group II ( P <0.05).Conclusions TCI propofol-based anesthesia was associated with higher costs than inhaled anesthetics sevoflurane .
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2015年第32期4852-4854,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81200510)
关键词 全静脉麻醉 静吸复合麻醉 麻醉费用 腹腔镜胆囊切除术 Intravenous anesthesia Inhalation anesthesia Anesthesia costs Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Early recovery, cognitive function and costs of a desflurane inhalational vs. a total intravenous anaesthesia regimen in long‐term surgery[J]. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica . 2005 (1)
  • 2Thomas G. Johans.The Cost of Propofol[J]. Anesthesia & Analgesia . 1995 (6)
  • 3Michael K. Rosenberg,Patrick Bridge,Morris Brown.Cost Comparison: A Desflurane- Versus a Propofol-based General Anesthetic Technique[J]. Anesthesia & Analgesia . 1994 (5)
  • 4Chernik DA,Gillings D,Laine H,et al.Validity and reliability of the observers assessment of alertness/sed ation scale: study with in travenous midazolam. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology . 1990
  • 5Alhashemi J A,Miller D R,O’Brien H V,Hull K A.Cost-effectiveness of inhalational, balanced and total intravenous anaesthesia for ambulatory knee surgery. Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d’anesthésie . 1997
  • 6Fombeur Patricia O,Tilleul Patrick R,Beaussier Marc J,Lorente Christine,Yazid Lassaad,Lienhart André H.Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane. American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists . 2002
  • 7Boldt J,Müller M,Uphus D,Hempelmann G.[Cost aspects in anesthesia. Propofol versus isoflurane anesthesia]. Der Anaesthesist . 1996

共引文献1

同被引文献44

引证文献8

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部