期刊文献+

溶栓后介入与直接介入对急性心肌梗死的疗效比较研究 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较溶栓后介入与直接介入对急性心肌梗死的疗效,探讨最佳治疗措施。方法选择2016年4月—2018年4月本院心内科收治的86例急性心肌梗死患者作为研究对象,按照随机数表法分为观察组和对照组两组,每组各43例。观察组予以溶栓后介入疗法,对照组予以直接介入疗法。评定与比较两组患者手术情况、心功能改善情况。结果观察组TIMI3级血流95.35%,开通率97.67%,CKMB峰值(261.07±212. 11) U/L,LVEF (53. 21±1. 78) mm Hg,SV (4. 71±0. 55) mm Hg,LVESD (51. 56±2. 27)mm Hg,LVEDD(52.33±3.45) mm Hg。与对照组比较,观察组的TIMI3级血流、开通率、LVEF、SV均升高明显,LVESD、LVEDD、CK-MB峰值则降低明显,差异具统计学意义(χ~2=6.51、4.46,P<0.05;χ~2=7.32,P<0.05;χ~2=6.02,P<0.05;χ~2=6.11,P<0.05;χ~2=6.67、3.68,P<0.05)。结论与直接介入治疗比较,溶栓后介入治疗急性心肌梗死的疗效更佳,对于心功能改善效果更佳。
作者 张俊江
机构地区 西平县人民医院
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2019年第10期1220-1221,共2页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献70

  • 1Smith LG, Herlitz J, Karlsson T, et al. International comparison of treatment and long - term outcomes for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: Minneapolis/St. Panl, MN, USA and Goteborg, Sweden [J]. Eur Heart J,2013,34:3191 -3197.
  • 2Pal'tseva E M, Rodina AV, Andreev DA,et al. Urokinase- type plas- minogen activator and its inhibitor type 1 in the diagnosis of evolving complications in coronary heart disease [ J ]. Klin Lab Diagn ,2010: 51 -55.
  • 3Fitchett DH,Theroux P, Brophy JM, et al. Assessment and manage- ment of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) :a Canadian perspective on current guideline - recommended treatment - part 2 :ST - segment el- evation myocardial infarction [ J ]. Can J Cardiol, 2011, 27 (Suppl.) :S402 -S412.
  • 4A1 - Othman AA, A1 - Tawil NG. Effect of thrombolytic therapy on the incidence of early Jeft ventricular infarct expansion in acute ante- rior myocardial infarction[ J]. Oman Med J,2011,26:431 -435.
  • 5Young JJ, Chung ES, Menon SG, et al. Early revaseularization and ACC/AHA guideline - compliant medical management improve left ventricular function and short - term prognosis in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and severe left ventricular dystunc- tion [ J ] J lnvasive Cardiol , 2006,18:540 - 543.
  • 6Sabatine M S,Cannon C P,Gibson C M,et al.The long-term prognostic value of optimal timely percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infraction[J].ACTA Universitatis Medicinalis Nanjing(Natural Science),2014,34(6):766-771.
  • 7Armstrong P W,Boden W E.Reperfusion paradox in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction[J].Ann Intern Med,2011,155(6):389-391.
  • 8Sánchez P L,Fernández-Avilés F.Routine early coronary angioplasty after thrombolysis in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction:lysis is not the final step[J].Eur Heart J,2011,32(8):927-930.
  • 9Larson D M,Duval S,Sharkey S W,et al.Safety and efficacy of a pharmaco-invasive reperfusion strategy in rural ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with expected delays due to longdistance transfers[J].Eur Heart J,2012,33(10):1232-1240.
  • 10Dubey L,Sharma S,Gautam M,et al.Cardiogenic shock complicating acute,myocardial infarction-a review[J].Acta Cardiol,2011,66(6):691-699.

共引文献97

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部