《存在与时间》——《尼各马可伦理学》的改写?

Being and Time:A "Translation" of Nicomachean Ethics?

自20世纪80年代以来,海德格尔的亚里士多德的阐释开始受到学界的重视,其中不得不提的是伏尔皮对这一课题的研究,特别是他对《存在与时间》和《尼各马可伦理学》的平行关系的探讨,后者已经成为海德格尔研究界的一个广为人知的经典论题。作者指出,海德格尔在对胡塞尔的真理理论的批判中走向了亚里士多德,他在《存在与时间》中所提出的实存论分析乃是对亚里士多德的实践哲学的转化,这种转化被称为'存在论化'。其中,最主要的一组对应是在手事物、上手事物和此在与理论、制作和实践的对应。海德格尔改变了亚里士多德对三者的排序,并且通过将实践理解为人生此在的存在方式,从而塑造出以实践为中心的统一结构和理解模式。通过详尽的分析,作者卓有成效地表明了海德格尔与亚里士多德之对话的基本方式及其当代意义。

Heidegger’s interpretation of Aristotle has been valued by academic circles since 1980s.Volpi’s studies on this subject cannot be ignored,especially his investigation of the parallel relationship between Being and Time and Nicomachean thics,which has already been a well-known classical thesis among the Heidegger research community.The author indicates that Heidegger has turned to Aristotle during his critique of Husserl’s truth theory.The ontological analysis presented in the Being and Time is in fact a conversion of Aristotle’s practical philosophy;this conversion is called'Ontologicalize.'The most important group of concept-correlation is the correlation between Vorhanden,Zu-handen as well as Dasein and theory,produce as well as practice.Heidegger alters Aristotle’s ordering of the three,and shapes a unified construction and understanding model with practice as its center by considering practice as the way of being as Dasein.With detailed analyses,the author effectively demonstrates the basic pattern of the dialogue between Heidegger and Aristotle,as well as its current significance.