期刊文献+

应用宫腔镜手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的效果分析 被引量:15

Analysis of the effect of application of hysteroscopy operation treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨分析应用宫腔镜手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的临床效果。方法 :选取2010年1月至2014年1月间我院收治的剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠患者72例作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组(36例)和观察组(36例),为对照组患者实施清宫手术,为观察组患者实施宫腔镜手术,观察对比两组患者的临床疗效,并将对比的结果及两组患者的临床资料进行回顾性的分析。结果 :观察组36例患者的手术时间为(28.3±2.5)min,术中出血量为(63.1±8.2)ml,术后住院时间为(5.6±1.3)d,术毕至月经来潮时间为(39.4±6.1)d,β-HCG恢复正常的时间为(15.9±1.3)d;对照组36例患者的手术时间为(40.3±6.7)min,术中出血量为(98.2±12.4)ml,术后住院时间为(7.6±2.2)d,术毕至月经来潮时间为(60.3±5.9)d,β-HCG恢复正常的时间为(33.2±5.1)d。观察组患者的各项临床指标均明显优于对照组患者,差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。观察组患者对治疗效果的满意度为94.4%,对照组患者对治疗效果的满意度为80.6%,观察组患者对治疗效果的满意度明显高于对照组患者,差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论:应用宫腔镜手术治疗剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠的临床效果显著,值得在临床上推广应用。 Objective:To investigate the hysteroscopic operation treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP) effect. Methods: 36 cases of CSP underwent hysteroscopic operation as the observation group,underwent curettage CSP 36 cases as control group, compared the clinical effects of two groups.Results: The operative time, bleeding in the observation group, and the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter than that of controls (P < 0.05); observation group after menstruation and beta -HCG recovery time was significantly shorter than that of controls (P < 0.05); the normal time of the observation group satisfaction was 94.44%, significantly higher than that in control group 80.56% (P < 0.05).Conclusion:Hysteroscopic operation is safe and effective for the treatment of CSP, faster postoperative recovery, it is worthy of popularization and application.
作者 张强
出处 《当代医药论丛》 2015年第5期13-14,共2页
关键词 剖宫产术后子宫瘢痕妊娠 宫腔镜手术 临床效果 分析 Cesarean section Uterine scar pregnancy Hysteroscopic operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献37

  • 1杨清,王玉,尚涛.剖宫产瘢痕处早期妊娠临床特点及处理[J].中华围产医学杂志,2004,7(4):217-219. 被引量:13
  • 2张健,郑艾,郄明蓉,褚艳侠.剖宫产术后瘢痕部位妊娠23例临床分析[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2006,37(1):163-164. 被引量:16
  • 3刘菊红,李坚.10年子宫腔下部妊娠病例的回顾性分析[J].首都医科大学学报,2006,27(1):113-116. 被引量:44
  • 4刘志强,彭芝兰,杨太珠.超声在诊断及治疗剖宫产切口部位妊娠中的临床价值[J].临床超声医学杂志,2006,8(2):95-97. 被引量:23
  • 5Seow KM, Huang LW, Lin YH, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasoud Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23 : 247- 253.
  • 6Godin PA, Bassil S, Donnez J, et al. An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous cesarean scar. Fertil Steril, 1997, 67 : 398-400.
  • 7Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P, et al. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Uhrasoud Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 16 : 592-593.
  • 8Haimov-kochman R, Sciaky-Tamir Y, Yanai N, et al. Conservative management of two ectopic pregnancies implanted in previous uterine scars. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 19: 616-619.
  • 9Marchiole P, Gorlero F, de Caro G, et al. Intramural pregnancy embedded in a previous Cesarean section scar treated conservatively. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23: 307-309.
  • 10Graesslin O, Dedecker F Jr, Quereux C, et al. Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 105: 869-871.

共引文献247

同被引文献93

引证文献15

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部