期刊文献+

船舶驾驶失效搁浅概率的混合事件树分析 被引量:6

Hybrid Event Tree Calculation of Ship Grounding Probability Caused by Piloting Failure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统事件树不能分析和考虑人因错误为主的基本事件的发生概率及其敏感性和不确定性这一问题 ,通过引入模糊错误率及模糊错误概率的概念 ,将传统事件树中人因错误为主的基本事件的发生概率用模糊错误率表示 ,非人因错误为主的基本事件的发生概率用模糊概率表示 .采用混合事件树方法得到了船舶驾驶失效引起的搁浅的模糊概率 ,定义了模糊敏感性和不确定性因子并对其进行了分析 ,制定了减小船舶搁浅事故发生概率的相关措施 .计算结果表明 ,本文提出的方法在处理包含人因错误为主的事件的船舶搁浅概率计算问题时是有效的 . The probability of occurrence of human-error-dominated event can not be effectively handled by using conventional event tree method, in which it is also impossible to consider the sensitivity and uncertainty of basic events' probabilities. To overcome these disadvantages, the concepts of fuzzy error rate and fuzzy error possibility were introduced to represent the failure probability of human-error-dominated event, while the fuzzy probability was used to represent the failure probability of non-human-error-dominated event. Based on it, the fuzzy probability of ship grounding with piloting failure was calculated by a hybrid event tree method. Moreover, the fuzzy sensitivity index and the fuzzy uncertainty index were defined. Some grounding probability reducing measures were verified by the sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. The results indicate that the proposed approach is useful in analyzing the probability of occurrence of human-error-dominated event.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第8期1146-1150,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金资助项目 (2 0 0 0 0 2 480 2 )
关键词 船舶搁浅 模糊错误率 模糊错误概率 人因错误 Failure analysis Fuzzy sets Probability Trees (mathematics)
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1陈刚,张圣坤.船舶搁浅概率的模糊事件树分析[J].上海交通大学学报,2002,36(1):112-116. 被引量:16
  • 2Amrozowica M D. A probabilistic analysis of tanker groundings[A]. Proceedings of the Seventh(1997)International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference[C]. USA:International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, 1997. 313- 320.
  • 3Huang D, Chen T, Wang M J J. A fuzzy set approach for event tree analysis[J]. Fuzzy Sets mad Systems, 2001,118(2) : 153- 165.
  • 4Onisawa T. Subjective analysis of system reliability and its analyzer [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996,83(2):249-269.
  • 5Groeneweg J. Controlling the controllable [M].Netherlands :Leiden University DSWD Press, 1994.
  • 6Swain A D,Guttmann H E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications[M]. Washington D C:U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983.
  • 7Chun M H, Ahn K- Ⅱ . Assessment of the potential applicability of fuzzy set theory to accident progression event trees with phenomenological uncertainties[J], Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1992,37(3):237-252.

二级参考文献6

  • 1[1]Goulielmos A M,Kostas Giziakis.Risk of collisions and groundings in bulk carries and tankers[A].The Proceedings of the Seventh(1997) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference[C].USA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers,1997.275-288.
  • 2[2]Singer D.A fuzzy set approach to fault tree and reliability analysis[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1990,34:145-155.
  • 3[3]Hideo Tanaka.Fault-tree analysis by fuzzy probability[J].IEEE Transaction on Reliability,1993,R-32(5):453-457.
  • 4[4]Amrozowicz M D.A probabilistic analysis of tanker groundings[A].The Proceedings of the Seventh(1997) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference[C].USA: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers,1997.313-320.
  • 5[5]Amrozowicz M D.The quantitative risk of oil tanker groundings[D].Massachusetts: Department of Ocean Engineering,Massachusetts Institute of Technology,1996.
  • 6[6]Swain A D,Guttmann H E.Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant application[M].Washington D C: U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission,1983.

共引文献15

同被引文献47

  • 1周忠宝,董豆豆,周经伦.贝叶斯网络在可靠性分析中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(6):95-100. 被引量:88
  • 2Neil M,Fenton N,Forey S,et al.Using Bayesian belief networks to predict the reliability of military vehicles[J].Computing & Control Engineering Journal,2001,12(1):11-20.
  • 3Marsh W,Bearfield G.Using Bayesian networks to model accident causation in the UK railway industry[EB/OL].[2010-02-10].http://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/-william/PSAM7/accident_causation_PSAM7.pdf.
  • 4Norrington L,Quigley J,Russell A,et al.Modelling the reliability of search and rescue operations with Bayesian belief networks[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2008,93(7):940-949.
  • 5Kim M C,Seong P H.An analytic model for situation assessment of nuclear power plant operators based on Bayesian inference[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2006,91(13):270-282.
  • 6Luxhφj J T.Probabilistic causal analysis for system safety risk assessments in commercial air transport[C]//Proceedings of the Workshop on Investigating and Reporting of Incidents and Accidents.Williamsburg,VA,USA,2003:17-38.
  • 7Trucco P,Cagno E,Ruggeri F,et al.A Bayesian belief network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis:a case study in maritime transportation[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2008,93(6):845-856.
  • 8Federal Transit Administration.Transit safety & security statistics & analysis 2003 annual report (formerly SAMIS)[R].Washington DC,USA:United States Department of Transportation,2005.
  • 9Ren J,Jenkinson I,Wang J.An offshore risk analysis method using fuzzy Bayesian network[J].Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering,2009,131(4):041101.
  • 10Wickens C D.Engineering psychology and human performance[M].2nd ed.New York:Harper Collins Publishers Inc,1992:211-257.

引证文献6

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部