摘要
介绍了布鲁姆的六种"修正比",以及他对弗洛伊德的某些侧重点的修正。指出了布鲁姆的三个缺点:即试图采用醒目、华丽的语汇以独树一帜而取胜;论证时经常采用循环论证的方法;静态地、历时地考察文学影响。最后得出结论:本书并没有达到布鲁姆所标榜的"具有矫正作用"的目的。
This paper introduces Bloom's six ratios of revision, and his revision to some of Fleud's emphasis, pointing out Bloom's three shortcomings, namely: his attempt to attract attention with eyecatching and flamboyant terminology, his adoption of circular definition to explain the terminology, his static and diachronic way to study literary influence ; and finally it concludes that this book is not corrective as Bloom expected to.
出处
《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》
2003年第1期80-83,共4页
Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)