期刊文献+

连香树科及其近缘植物matK序列分析和系统学意义(英文) 被引量:10

Phylogenetic Affinities of Cercidiphyllaceae Based on matK Sequences
下载PDF
导出
摘要 测定和分析了连香树科(Cercidiphyllaceae)、交让木科(Daphniphyllaceae)、金缕梅科(Hamamelidaceae)代表植物的叶绿体matK序列(5’端31bps除外),以木兰属作为外类群,应用邻接法构建分子系统树,结果表明:连香树科与水青树科的亲缘关系较远。连香树科、交让木科和金缕梅科形成了一个自展数据支持率(bootstrap)为100%的单系类群,其中金缕梅科枫香属(Liquidambar)、红花荷属(Rhodoleia)和金缕梅属(Hamamelis)虽构成了一个单系类群,但自展数据支持率仅为68%;连香树科与交让木科构成的单系分支自展数据支持率仅为53%。由于连香树科、交让木科、金缕梅科之间的进化距离相当短,表明这3个科之间亲缘关系密切,内部分支的自展数据支持率不高,表明它们之间准确的亲缘关系有待进一步研究。本研究结果与rbcL、aptB、18SrDNA序列分析结果相似,但自展数据支持率更高,表明matK序列分析可应用于较高等级分类群系统发育关系的研究。 To further resolve the phylogenetic affinities of Cercidiphyllaceae,matK gene sequences generated for Tetracentraceae,Daphniphyllaceae,Cercidiphyllaceae and Liquidambar,Rhodoleia and Hamamelis of Hamamelidaceae,were analyzed using Neighbor-Joining method with Magnolia as an outgroup.The matK consensus tree displays similar topology to those of rbcL,atpB,and 18S rDNA sequences analyses respectively and combined with greater phylogenetic resolution.It shows that Cercidiphyllaceae,Daphniphylliaceae and Hamamelidaceae formed a robust clade,but relationships among them are not resolved;the phylogenetic relationships of Tetracentraceae to Cercidiphyllaceae are not so closed as traditional treatment.Thus,several lines of evidence,derived from both the chloroplast genome and 18S rDNA sequences,suggest the presence of considerably phylogenetic affinities between Cercidiphyllaceae,Daphniphyllaceae,and Hamamelidaceae,further information on some other quickly-evolved genes are needed to resolve phylogenetic relationships among them.The study corroborates the idea that matK sequences have potential in resolving phytogeny at family level.
出处 《生态科学》 CSCD 2003年第2期113-115,129,共4页 Ecological Science
基金 国家杰出青年基金(39825104) 国家自然科学基金(30070053,40106014) 广东省自然科学基金(000760)
关键词 连香树科 MATK序列 系统发育 交让木科 金缕梅科 Cercidiphyllaceae Daphniphyllaceae Hamamelidaceae matK Phylogeny
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Dahlgren R. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms[J]. Bot J Lin Soc, 80:91-124.
  • 2Endress P K. 1986. Floral structure, systematics, and phylogeny in trochodendrales[J]. Ann Missouri Bot Gard, 73:297-324.
  • 3Cronquist A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering Plants[M]. New York: columbia University Press.
  • 4APG. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants[J]. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard, 84(4):531-553.
  • 5Takhtajan A. 1996. Diversity and classification of flowering plants[M]. New York: Columbia University Press. 128-141.
  • 6Tang Y. 1943. Systematic anatomy of the woods of the Hamamelidaceae[J]. Bull Fan Memorial inst. Biol., 1-63,Tables 1-3.
  • 7Qiu Y L, Chase M W, Hoot S B. 1998. Phylogenetics of the Hamamelidae and their allies: parsimony analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL[J]. Int. J. Plant Sci, 159(6):1-13.
  • 8Chase M W, Soltis D E, Olmstead R G, et al., 1993.Phylogentics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL[J]. Ann Mo Bot Gard,80: 528-580.
  • 9Soltis D E, Soltis P S, Nickrent D L, et al., 1997.Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences[J]. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard., 84: 1-49.
  • 10Hoot S B, Magallon S, Crane P R, 1999. Phylogeny of basal eudicots based on three molecular data sets; atpB, rbcL, and 18S nuclear ribosomal DNA sequencers[J]. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 86(1): 1-32.

同被引文献152

引证文献10

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部