期刊文献+

结构化面试构思效度现场研究 被引量:13

Construct Validity in Structure Interivew: A Field Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 面试是一种广泛使用的测评手段,面试的构思效度历来是研究者讨论的热点。本文通过结构化面试的现场研究,围绕面试构思效度问题,旨在考察结构化面试的信度、构思特征及其影响因素。分析结果表明 :(1)结构化面试要素间一致性和考官间评判一致性均较高;(2)面试要素间密切相关,探索性因素分析表明面试评价可能是一个单维构思;(3)面试成绩受到社会经历以及外向性、开放尝试和责任意识等个性因素的影响,说明面试可能测评到了人际交往和内在激励等特征。 With a field study of situational interview, this paper intendsto examine reliabilities, construct characteristics, and correlates ofstructured interview in an attempt to accumulate more evidence forconstruct validity. The results indicate that (1) structured interviewhas quite high intrarater and interrater reliabilities; (2) competenciesmeasured in the interview are closely related with each other, andexploratory factor analysis shows an uniconstruct for thosecompetencies; and (3) interview performance are impacted byleadership experience, extrosiveness, openness to experience, andconscientiousness, which suggest that construct of structured interviewmight tap interpersonal and motivational traits. Directions for futureresearch are also discussed.
作者 洪自强 严进
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 2003年第4期21-24,48,共5页 Nankai Business Review
关键词 结构化面试 人事测评 效度 现场研究 信度 面试要素 个性因素 人际交往 内在激励 Structured Interview Personnel Assessment Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Arvey R. D. and Campion J. E.. The Employment Interviewer: A Summary and Review of Recent Research. Personnel Psychology,1982, (35): 281-322.
  • 2Schmidt F. L. and Hunter J. E.. The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings. Psychological Bulletin, 1998, (124): 262-274.
  • 3McDaniel M. A.; Whetzel D. L.; Shmidt F. L. and Maurer S.D.. The Validity of Employment Interviews: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, (79): 599-616.
  • 4Huffcutt A, I, and Arthur W. Jr.. Interview Validity for Entrylevel Jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994, (79): 184-190.
  • 5Kinicki A. J. and Lockwood C. A.. The Interview Process: an Examination of Factors Recruiters Use in Evaluating Job Applicants. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1985, (26): 117-125.
  • 6Huffcutt A. I.; Roth P. L. and McDaniel M. A.. A Meta-ana-lytic Investigation of Cognitive Ability in Employment Interview Evaluations: Moderating Characteristics and Implications for Incremental Validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996,(81): 459-473.
  • 7Conway J, M.; Jako R.A. and Goodman D. F,. A Meta-analy-sis of Interrater and Internal Consistency Reliability of Selection Interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995, (80):565-579.
  • 8Schmitt N.; Pulakos E. D.; Nason E. and Whitney, D. J.. Likability and Similarity as Potential Sources of Predictor-related Criterion Bias in Validation Research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1996, (68): 272-286.

同被引文献138

引证文献13

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部