摘要
笛卡儿和贝克莱在论证“心”的实在性上,都运用了递进式推论的方式,怀疑常识。但在论证的内容上又存在着质的差异。这种异同展示于《第一哲学沉思》和《西拉和菲伦诺对话录》中。
When proving the realistic nature of 'Mind,' both Descartes and Berkeley questioned the common sense, and made use of progressive reasoning in their texts. This difference and similarity lie in both Meditations on First Philosophy and Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous
出处
《洛阳师范学院学报》
2003年第4期9-11,共3页
Journal of Luoyang Normal University
关键词
笛卡儿
贝克莱
心
沉思
Descartes
Berkeley
mind
meditation