1Gartenschlager M, Schweden F, Gast K, et al. Pulmonary nodules: detection with low-dose vs conventional-dose spiral CT. Eur Radiol, 1998,8:609.
2Henschke CI, McCanley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. The Lancet, 1999, 354:99.
3Sone S, Takashima S, Li F, et al. Mass screening for lung cancer with mobile spiral computed tomography scanner. The Lancet. 1998, 351:1242.
4Mayo JR, Hartman TE, Lee KS, et al. CT of the chest : minimal tube current required for good image quality with the least radiation dose.AJR, 1995, 164:603.
5Lee KS, Primaek SL, Staple CA, et al. Chronic infiltrative lung disease: comparison of diagnostic accuracies of radiography and low and conventional-dose thin-section CT. Radiology, 1994, 19:669.
6Sone OK, Kiyono, Takashimas. Optimal tube current for lung cancer screening with low spiral CT. Acta Radiol, 2000, 41:352.
7Diederich S, Lenzen H, Windmann R, et al. Pulmonary nodules : experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT. Radiology, 1999, 213:289.
8Itch S, Ikeda M, Arahata S, et al. Lung cancer screening: minimum tube current required for helical CT. Radiology, 2000, 215 : 175.
9Mori K, Tominagek, Hirose T, et al. Utility of low-dose helical CT as a second step after plain chest radiography for mass screening for lung cancer. J Thorac Imaging, 1997, 12:173.
10Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, et al. Peripheal lung cancer:screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology, 1996, 201:798.
