期刊文献+

东亚地区的安全保障与非东亚要素 被引量:9

East Asian Security and its Non-East Asian Factors
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究东亚地区的安全保障与“非东亚要素”时 ,必须考虑在地理上不属于东亚的要素 (大国 )和不是东亚固有的要素这两个方面。前者无论是从军事实力、政治影响力还是从对东亚的积极介入程度来看 ,首要因素是美国。后者则包括能源、全球经济、宗教、文化等等。美国从地理上来讲是“非东亚要素” ,但撇开美国无法谈论东亚地区的安全保障。然而 ,尽管美国的意图和物质力量是全球性的 ,但它并不具有保障东亚地区安全的“软能力”(governability)。东亚各国判断美国在东亚以军事同盟为基轴的领导的是与非时的标准是 :(1)美国是否对本地区的政治和经济稳定起积极作用 ?(2 )是否有利于防止和抑制地区纠纷 ?(3)能否有效地对付恐怖主义等超国家、非传统的威胁 ?最后 ,作者认为经济危机、能源危机、环境危机等非军事危机将来可能是威胁东亚地区安全的最大因素 ,为此 ,建立由东亚各国组成的“非军事危机的非军事管理”机制是东亚各国的紧迫课题。 When discussing the security of East Asia and its“non East Asian elements,”we must consider both issues outside the geographic area and issues that have global implications.The former includes the United States with its overpowering military strength and political influence and its strategy of actively committing to pan Pacific affairs.The latter includes global economies,religions, and cultures.East Asia cannot consider the security issue without considering the United States,even though it is a non East Asian actor geographically.U.S.intentions and physical power are global,but it does not have a“soft ability”(governability) to guarantee the security of East Asia.When judging the appropriateness of U.S.leadership in this region,we should consider the following questions:1.) Can the U.S.commitment contribute to political and economic stability in the region?2.) Does the U.S.commitment contribute to the prevention and restraint of conflict of the region?and 3.) Does the U.S.commitment effectively eliminate nontraditional threats such as terrorism?In the near future we will be faced with many nonmilitary crises due to energy,environment,and human security problems.Therefore,it is urgent that the East Asian countries manage and control their nonmilitary regional crises.
作者 毛里和子
出处 《世界经济与政治》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第8期52-57,共6页 World Economics and Politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Joseph Nye.Jr.The Paradox of American Power,Oxford University Press.2002.
  • 2[日]小泉纯一郎.《东亚地区的日本和东盟—寻求坦率的伙伴关系》,http://www.mofa.go.jp/jofaj/press/enzetau/14/ekoi-0114.html.
  • 3[日]黑柳米司.《ASEAN再活性化的途径和日本》,[日]《世界周报》,2002年2月26日.
  • 4[日]小川芳树.《亚洲的能源安全保障》[J].[日]国际问题,2002.
  • 5Department of Defense.U.S.Security Strategy for the East Asia-Pacific Region,USGPO.Feb,1995.
  • 6International Institute for Strategic Studies,the Military Balance 1998-1999.Oxford University Press,October 1998.p.295-297.
  • 7[美]哈里·哈于(Harry Harding).《与发展的中国相处》,《环球时报》,2002年8月8日.
  • 8Joseph Nye,Jr."East Asian Security:The Case for Deep Engagement."Foreign Affairs,July/August 1995.
  • 9White House,The National Security Strategy of the United Stated of America,September 2000.http://www.bhitehouse.gov/nsc/print/nssall.html.
  • 10[日]森木敏.《冷战后美国的威胁认识和安全保障战略的变化》[J].[日]国际问题,2002.

同被引文献100

引证文献9

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部