期刊文献+

关于新时期我国人文社会科学国际化发展若干问题的思考 被引量:1

Treflections on the Development of the Internationalization of Chinese Humanities and Social Sciences in the New Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以"自主创新、内涵提高"为主,借鉴与遵循国际学术标准为辅,是新时期我国人文社会科学国际化发展道路的正确选择。这一道路的提出,不仅是对目前我国人文社会科学国际化理工思路的纠正,而且在我国全面推进小康社会建设、建设创新型国家和构建社会主义和谐社会的新时期具有重要的意义。"自主创新、内涵提高"为主、借鉴与遵循国际学术标准为辅的道路,具有深刻的内涵,对于具有"国际通行"的人文社会科学和"中国特色"鲜明的人文社会科学有不同的要求。学科体系设置、研究范式与研究方法、教师国际学术能力以及现行的学术绩效考核评价体系,是影响我国人文社会科学国际化发展的主要因素。在推进我国人文社会科学国际化发展时,要正确处理好战略与战术、形式与内容、本土化与国际化、传统与创新、竞争性与吸引性的关系。 The development of the internationalization of Chinese humanities and social sciences in the new era follows the right path of drawing upon and abiding by the international academic paradigms and standards to achieve ‘ independent innovation and quality improvement ’ Such a path will not only correct the current inclination towards polytechnic sciences and thoughts about the development of the internationalization of Chinese humanities and social sciences, but also has significant meanings and values in the new era of constructing a well-off Chinese society and building an innovative nation and a harmonious socialist society. The path of ‘ independent innovation and quality improvement ’ has profound implications and different requirements and standards for those ' internationally universal humanities and social sciences ' and for those disciplines with Chinese characteristics. As we push forward through the road, we should deal with five kinds of relationships properly, i.e., between strategy and tactics, form and content, localization and internationalization, tradition and innovation, competitiveness and attractiveness.
作者 张伟
出处 《中国人民大学教育学刊》 2013年第1期123-134,共12页 Renmin University of China Education Journal
关键词 人文社会科学 国际化 humanities and social sciences internationalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1苏森祜.试论社会科学研究成果的价值特点及其评价原则[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),1997,37(1):129-134. 被引量:8
  • 2顾海兵.人文社会科学学术评价规则的时空维度[J].学术研究,2004(10):33-37. 被引量:12
  • 3王维杰.论哲学社会科学向生产力的转化[J].胜利油田党校学报,2005,18(3):41-43. 被引量:1
  • 4张彦.科学价值系统论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1994.26,27,39-40.
  • 5刘大椿.中国人民大学中国人文社会科学发展研究报告2002[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003..
  • 6CLAIRE DONOVAN.The governance of social science and everyday epistemology[J].Public Administration,1983(3):597-615.
  • 7HUW DAVIES,SANDRA NUTLEY,ISABEL WALTER.Approaches to assessing the non-academic impact of social science research.report of the esrc symposium on assessing the non-academic impact of research 12Th/13Th may 2005[EB/OL].(2007 -01 -02).http://www.esrcsocietytoday.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/Images/non-academic_ impact_ symposium_report_tcm6-16593.
  • 8FIKRET SENSES.Difficulties and Trade -Offs In Performance Evaluation In Social Sciences-A Turkish Perspective[EB/OL].(2003-03-11)[2007-01-02].http://www.erc.metu.edu.tr/menu/series03/0311.pdf.
  • 9Research Evaluation and Policy Project.Quantitative Indicators For Research Assessment-A Literature Review.Literature Review For Arc Linkage Project:The Strategic Assessment of Research Performance Indicators[EB/OL][2007-01-02].http://repp.anu.edu.au/Literature% 20Review3.pdf.
  • 10AHRB.Research in the creative and performing arts 'The RAE and Research in the Creative & Performing Arts.Review of Research Assessment'-an AHRB Paper[J].Journal of Visual Art Practice,2004,3(1):75 -78.

共引文献24

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部