美国公立研究型大学招生管理决策与模式之比较——以密歇根大学、弗吉尼亚大学、北卡罗来纳大学为例被引量：3

A Comparative Study on American Public Universities' Admission Decisions and Models: Base on the Cases of the University of Michigan, the University of Virginia and the University of North Carolina

下载PDF

导出

摘要公共财政枯竭引起学费持续上涨,美国公立研究型大学开始更加关注招生管理。本文以美国三所顶尖级公立大学为例,通过访谈和电子邮件调查的方法对这三所院校招生管理的决策和模式进行比较分析,探讨他们在竞争优质生源和解决有限公共经费中的举措,以及为保持顶尖公立大学市场地位和声誉所作出的努力,希冀对我国大学招生管理的建设与发展有所启示。 With continued tuition rises due to public finance restrictions,American public research universities begin to pay more attention to student admission management. This paper, taking three top public universities as examples, through interviews and e- mail survey methods, conducted a comparative analysis on their admission decisions and models and discussed their strategies on how to attract higher quality students, deal with the limited public funds and maintain the top public university' market status and reputation. The study hoped to give some inspirations for the construction and development of Chinese university admission management.

作者卓泽林

机构地区华东师范大学教育学部

出处《中国人民大学教育学刊》 2014年第4期56-69,共14页 Renmin University of China Education Journal

关键词美国公立研究型大学招生管理决策模式私营化 America Public research university Admission Management Decisions Models privatization

分类号 G649.712 [文化科学—高等教育学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1罗杰·L．盖格,唐纳德·E．海勒,杨素红(译),鲍威(校).私有化与美国高等教育财政的新趋势[J].北京大学教育评论,2011,9(1):15-32. 被引量：10
2高等教育财政[M]. 人民教育出版社, 2004.高等教育财政[M]人民教育出版社,2004.
3Altbach PG,Bedahl RO,Gumport PJ.American Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Social, Political, and Economic Challenges. Journal of Women s Health . 1999
4Slaughter S,Leslie L.Academic capitalism: Politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university[]..1997
5Newman,Frank.Rising Expectation: Can State Help Renew Quality?. Change . 1985
6Duderstadt,J.J.A Study in Contrasts:Postsecondary Education in Michigan and Ontario. Summit on the Future of Ontario Universities . 1997
7Douglas M Priest,Edward P.St.John.Privatization and public universities. . 2006
8Duderstadt,J.J,Womack,F.W.The Future of the Public University in America:Beyondthe Crossroads. . 2003
9Jon Travis.Privatizing American public higher education:racing down a slippery slope. Jour-nal of Case Studies in Education .
10Public Sector Consultants Inc.Michigan’’s Higher Education System. . 2003

二级参考文献35

1Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Education at a Glance 2009. Paris: Author.
2National Center for Education Statistics. (2010a). Digest of education statistics, 2009. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Education.
3College Board. (2009a). Trends in college pricing, 2009. Washington, DC: Author.
4U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). Race and Hispanic origin of householder--Families by median and mean income: 1947 to 2009. http://www, census, gov/hhes/www/income/data/historical/families/f05, xls, Retrieved October 3.
5Heller, D. E. (in press). The financial aid picture: Realism, Surrealism, or Cubism? J. C. Smart (Ed.) , Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, Volume 26. New York : Springer.
6Mumper, M. ( 1996). Removing college price barriers : What government has done and why it hasn't worked. Albany: State University of New York Press.
7Wilkinson, R. (2005). Aiding students, buying students: Financial aid in America. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
8College Board. (2009b). Trends in student aid, 2009. Washington, DC: Author.
9Heller, D. E. (2002). The policy shift in state financial aid programs. J. C. Smart (Ed.). Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. Vol. 17, pp. 221-261. New York: Agathon Press.
10Heller, D. E. (2004, April). State funding for higher education: The impact on college access. Paper presented at the Symposium on Financing Higher Education. Illinois State University, Normal.