期刊文献+

真相与和解委员会机制对促进和保障人权的作用——以南非真相与和解委员会为重点 被引量:2

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa and Its Contribution to the World's Human Rights Cause
原文传递
导出
摘要 真相委员会是过渡司法中最具特色的机制。在目前存在过的所有真相委员会中,最受世人关注的当属南非的真相与和解委员会。它进一步发挥了真相委员会的功能,不仅澄清真相,更试图通过真相的讲述来促进种族间的和解。其对世界人权事业的作用主要包括:成功避免国家陷入内战,捍卫人民最基本人权;成为重建社会、实现民族和解的关键;为民主转型提供了新的参考模式,为世界处理过渡司法问题贡献了宝贵经验。南非真相与和解委员会制度为诸多转型国家仿效。 The Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa represents the most distinctive mechanism of transitional justice and has arguably attracted the most attention worldwide among all the truth commissions that have ever existed.The Commission has gone one step further in giving full play to the role of a truth commission by not only bringing out the truth but also seeking to promote racial reconciliation through truth-telling.Its contributions to the world's human rights cause mainly include;successfully averting the country from falling victim to civil war and thereby defending the most basic human rights of the people;crucially paving the way for societal reconstruction and national reconciliation;and offering a new reference model for democratic transition as well as valuable experiences for the world to address democratic transition.Widely recognized as the biggest success story of its kind in the world,the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa has been emulated by many countries in transition.
作者 丁乐超
出处 《人权》 2015年第1期120-130,共11页 Human Rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献36

  • 1[加纳] 科菲·安南.《冲突中和冲突后社会的法治和过渡司法:秘书长的报告》,2004年8月3日,http://www.un.org/zh/documents/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/2004/616,2009年12月29日.
  • 2A.G.Reiter,"The Transitional Justice Bibliography,"http://sites.google.com/site/transitionaljusticedatabase/transitional-justice-bibliography,2009-12-29.
  • 3[美] 塞缪尔·亨廷顿.《第三波-20世纪后期民主化浪潮》,刘军宁译,上海:上海三联书店,1998年.
  • 4M.Amstutz,The Healing of Nations:The Promise and Limits of Political Forgiveness,Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,Inc.,2005.
  • 5N.J.Kritz,Transitional Justice:How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes,Washington DC:United States Institute of Peace,1995.
  • 6[法] 古斯塔夫·勒庞.《乌合之众:大众心理研究》,冯克利译,北京:中央编译出版社,2005年.
  • 7中评社.《吴乃德:好东西在台湾全变样!转型正义如老鼠》,2007年12月10日,http://gb.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1005/1/2/2/100512272.html?coluid=7&kindid=0&docid=100512272,2009年12月29日.
  • 8苏力.《思想的组织形式-《正义/司法的经济学》译序》,见[美] 波斯纳.《正义/司法的经济学》,苏力译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002年.
  • 9S.Landsman,"Alternative Responses to Serious Human Rights Abuses:Of Prosecution and Truth Commissions,"Law and Contemporary Problems,Vol.59,No.4(1996),pp.81-92.
  • 10[美] 约翰·W.道尔.《拥抱战败:第二次世界大战后的日本》,胡博译,北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2008年.

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部