期刊文献+

《世界人权宣言》与儒家伦理“精神” 被引量:3

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Confucian Ethics “Spirit”
原文传递
导出
摘要 世界人权宣言》所揭示的价值在当代正遭受攻击,所达成的人权价值共识遭受全球性分裂的危险,被断言"人权只有悖论可以提供"。究其根源在于,《世界人权宣言》所宣称的人权的形上本性——"理性"被无限放大而忽视了其伦理"精神"。历史和哲学显示,《世界人权宣言》蕴含着儒家伦理"精神",这种潜在的因子在世界历史进程中逐渐地浮现出来,成为弥合人权价值全球性分裂的力量。儒家伦理"精神"之于《世界人权宣言》的意义在于:在"精神"视角里,它的整体性观点,弥合个体权利与集体权利;它的关系性观点,注重人权的实现,超越"人权悖论";由价值共识走向共同行动,进而在评判世界人权进展中,不仅仅停留在价值共识,更为重要的在于共同行动。 At present,the value revealed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is under attack,and the consensus on human rights value is experiencing division globally,which asserts that'human rights can only be provided by paradox'.The root of this is that'reason',the metaphysical nature of human rights proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,is infinitely magnified while the'spirit'is ignored.History and philosophy showthat the Universal Declaration of Human Rights entails the Confucian ethical'spirit'.At this time,this potential factor is gradually emerging in the course of world history and became a force to bridge the global division of human rights values.The significance of Confucian ethics'spirit'to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights lies in:from the perspective of'spirit',its holistic view,bridging individual rights and collective rights;its relational viewfocuses on the realization of human rights and transcends the'paradox of human rights';progressing from the value consensus to common action,so that in the process of judging the progress of human rights in the world,we considernot only the value consensus,but also the common action.
作者 黄爱教 Huang Aijiao
出处 《人权》 2018年第5期49-61,共13页 Human Rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献58

  • 1樊浩.伦理的实体与不道德的个体[J].学术月刊,2006,38(5):55-61. 被引量:33
  • 2.《孟子·梁惠王下》[M].,..
  • 3Joseph Chan, "Confucian A*titudestoward Ethical Pluralism", In The Many and the One, edited by Richard Madsen and Tracy B. Strong. Princeton: Princeton Uni- versity Press, 2003, pp. 154 158.
  • 4唐君毅.《中国哲学与文化文集》,台北,学术书局,1988,第362页.
  • 5Xinzhong Yao. AnIntroduction to Confucianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 38--47. q' .
  • 6Henry Rosemont, "Why Take Rights Seriously? A Con- lucian Critique", In Human Rights and the World s Religions, edited by Leroy Rouner. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, p. 167, p. 168, p. 177.
  • 7Joseph Chan, "A Confucian Perspective on Hum Rights for Contemporary China", In The East Asian Challenge for Hu- man Rights, edited by Joanne R. Bauer and Daniel A. Bell, 212--37. Cambridge= Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 216.
  • 8Roger T. Ames, "Rites as Rights The Con{ucian Alternative", In Human Rights and the World ' s Religions, edited by Leroy Rouner. Notre Dame University of Notre Dame Press, 1988, p. 212.
  • 9Kwong-loi Shun, "Conception of the Person in Early Confucian Thought", In Confucian Ethics : A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community, edited by Kwong-loi Shun and Da- vid B. Wong, 183--202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, DD. 188 190. nt. 194 195.
  • 10Joseph Chan, "A Confucian Perspectire on Hum Rights for Contemporary China", In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Joanne R. Bauer and Daniel A. Bell, 212--37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 217--219.

共引文献29

同被引文献44

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部