期刊文献+

加拿大地盾湖泊中的沿岸小型甲壳动物(枝角目和桡足亚纲)酸化指示种

Littoral Microcrustacean (Cladocera and Copepoda) Indicators of Acidification in Canadian Shield Lakes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在过去两次间隔10年的加拿大地盾湖泊调查中,我们确定了一些沿岸小型甲壳动物的酸性指示种。我们总共发现了90种其丰度在非酸性湖中比在酸性湖中高出几倍的枝角目动物和桡足亚纲动物。在这两次调查中非酸性湖泊的动物群有所变化。1987年的调查中使用了活动捕集器,比在后来的,拉网式的调查中捕到的沿岸生物种类多。这两次调查中均在酸性湖泊中发现了类似的动物群,并找到了几个很好的指示种。例如,Acanthocycops vernalis只存在于PH值小于6的湖泊中。Sinobosmina sp.是常见物种,但只存在于pH值大于4.8的湖泊中。Tropocyclops extensus(近剑水蚤属)、Mesocyclops edax和Sidacrystallina(晶莹仙达蚤)比较常见,但只存在于pH值大于5的湖泊中;而Chydorus faviformis(盘肠蚤属)只存在于pH值大于5.9的湖泊中。在两次调查活动中均接受调查的3个湖泊中,这些酸性指示种在从酸化中复原的早期阶段进行的测定中显示出较好的前景。 We identify littoral microcrustacean indicators of acidification in 2 surveys of Canadian Shield lakes conducted 10 years apart. We found a total of 90 cladoceran and copepod species with richness increasing severalfold from acidic to nonacidic lakes. The fauna of the nonacidic lakes differed between the surveys. The 1987 survey employed activity traps, and caught more littoral taxa than the more recent, net-haul-based survey. Similar faunas were identified in the acidified lakes in both surveys, and several good indicator species were identified. For example, Acanthocycops vemalis was restricted to lakes with pH < 6. Sinobosmina sp. was very common but only in lakes with pH > 4.8. Tropocyclops extensus, Mesocyclops edax, and Sida crystallina were commonly found but only at pH > 5, and Chydorus faviformis only at pH > 5.9. These indicators showed promise in gauging the early stages of recovery from acidification in 3 lakes that were included in both surveys.
出处 《AMBIO-人类环境杂志》 2003年第3期208-213,共6页
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Keller, W., Gunn, J.M. and Yah, N.D. 1992. Evidence of biological recovery in acid-stressed lakes near Sudbury, Canada. Environ. Pollut. 78, 79-85.
  • 2Walseng, B. and Karlsen, L.F. 2001. Planktonic and littoral microcntstaceans as indices of recovery in limed lakes in S.E. Norway. Water Air Soil Pollut. 130, 1313-1318.
  • 3Yan, N.D., Keller, W., Somers, K.M.; Pawson, T.W. and Girard, R.E. 1996. Recovery of crustacean zooplankton communities from acid and metal contamination: comparing manipulated and reference lakes. Can. J. Fish..Aquat. Sci. 53, 1301-1327.
  • 4Locke, A., Sprules, W.G., Keller, W. and Pitblado, J.R. 1994. Zooplankton communities and water chemistry of Sudbury area lakes: changes related to pH recovery. Can. J. Fish. Aquat.Sci. 51, 151-160.
  • 5Hann, B.J. and.Turner, M.A. 2000. Littoral microcrustacea in Lake 302S in the Experimental Lakes Area of Canada: acidification and recovery. Freshwater Biol. 43, 133-146.
  • 6Fryer, G. 1980. Acidity and species diversity in freshwater crustacean faunas. Freshwater Biol. 10, 41-45.
  • 7Paterson, M. 1994. Paleolimnological reconstruction of recent changes in assemblages of Cladocera from acidified lakes in the Adirondack Mountains (New York)..L Freshwater Ecol. 11, 189-200.
  • 8Brakke, D.F., Davis, R.B. and Kenlan, K.H. 1984. Acidification and changes over time in the chydorid Cladocera assemblages of New England lakes. In: Early Biotic Responses Advancing Lake Acidification, Acid Precip. Ser. 6, pp. 85-104.
  • 9Walseng, B. and Schartau, A.K. 2001. Crustacean communities in Canada and Norway:Comparison of species along a pH gradient. Water Air Soil Pollut. 130, 1319-1324.
  • 10Gunn J. and Sandφy, S. 2001. Northern Lakes Recovery Study (NLRS) - Biomonitoring at the ecosystem level. Water Air Soil Pollut. 130, 131 - 140.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部