期刊文献+

社会运动与权利构造——以我国台湾地区“婚姻平权”运动(2016~2017)为例

Social Movements and the Construction of Rights: The “Marriage Equality” Movement in Chinese Taiwan (2016~2017)
原文传递
导出
摘要 马克思主义法社会学视野下的'权利构建主义'学说主张:权利既不来自超验的神力,也不来自实证法基础上的逻辑推理,而是来自具体的社会情景互动,尤其是各种权利相关的社会运动在其中扮演了关键角色。近年来,同性婚姻平权运动在我国台湾地区逐渐兴起,形成了法律上新的'权利话语'。这一运动不仅仅利用'反对歧视、争取平等'的话语体系为同性婚姻进行价值证成,更在现实中积极发展运动组织,联合政治、媒体与流行文化的'权力',推动了婚姻平权从街头政治走向了法律场域。通过对这一新兴权利案例的实证分析,构建主义的权利理论得到了经验上的论证与说明,并希望为我国新兴权利研究与新时代社会治理理论带来新的视角与反思。 The'Constructivist Theory of Rights'in the perspective of Marxist sociology of law claims that rights do not come from transcendental powers or logical reasoning based on positive laws,but from the social interactions in specific situations,especially the social movements related play a key role.In recent years,the movement of same-sex marriage right has gradually emerged in Chinese Taiwan,and formed a new legal'discourse of right'.This movement not only used the discourse of'fighting against discrimination and striving for equality'to prove the value of same-sex marriage,but also actively developed the movement organizations,uniting with the'power'of politics,media and pop culture,and finally promoted the marriage equality from street politics to the legal fields.Through the empirical analysis of this case of emerging right,the constructivist theory of rights has been empirically demonstrated and illustrated,and it is hoped that this will bring new perspectives and reflections to the studies of emerging rights and social regulation in New Era China.
作者 杨帆 史隽琸 Yang Fan;Shi Junzhuo
出处 《人权研究(辑刊)》 2019年第1期327-348,共22页 Journal of Human Rights
基金 司法部2017年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目(项目编号:17SFB3003)的阶段性成果
关键词 社会运动 权利建构主义 婚姻平权 台湾地区 社会治理 Social Movements Constructivist Theory of Rights Marriage Equality Chinese Taiwan Region Social Regulation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献197

  • 1赵鼎新.西方社会运动与革命理论发展之述评——站在中国的角度思考[J].社会学研究,2005(1):168-209. 被引量:194
  • 2李昌道.《加拿大同性婚姻法》透视[J].比较法研究,2006,20(1):72-77. 被引量:2
  • 3Robert Wintemute, Sacral Orientation and Human Rights: The United States Constitution, the European Convention and the Canadion Charter, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995, p.17.
  • 4Note, The Constitutional Status of Sexual Orientation: Homosexuality as a Suspect Classification, Harvard law Review, vol.98, 1985. pp.1289-- 1291.
  • 5Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).
  • 6Cass R. Sunstein, "Homosexuality and the Constitution", Ind. Law Journal, vol.70, 1994, p.3.
  • 7Evan Gerstmann, Same-Sex Marriage and The Constitution, Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp.14--16.
  • 8Kenji Yoshino, "Covering", Yale Law Journal, vol.111, 2002, p.876.
  • 9Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. at 684--86 (1973).
  • 10Kenji Yoshino, Suspect symbols: the literary argument for heightened security for gays, 96 Colum. L. Rev. (1996) . p. 1756.

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部