期刊文献+

过程写作中的同伴评价 被引量:27

Peer-conferencing in Process-writing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在一语和二语的调查结果表明,与教师评价相比,过程写作中的同伴评价有许多优点,它可以加强学生写作时为读者服务的意识、帮助学生理解写作的实质、增强批判性思维,最终提高自己的写作水平。在分析了同伴评价在我国英语课堂中使用较少的原因之后,作者提出只有加强必要的培训,才能培养出有创造性的自主学习者。 First, this article explores the advantages of peerconferencing in writing process in terms of reinforcing students' sense of reader, understanding the nature of writing, enhancing critical thinking and bettering writing ability. Secondly, it is analyzed the reasons why peerconferencing is not popular in Chinese writing classroom. Last, the training of peerconferencing is introduced for the purpose of development autonomouslearners.
作者 周雪
出处 《甘肃教育学院学报(社会科学版)》 2003年第4期85-88,共4页 Journal of Gansu Education College(Social Sciences)
关键词 同伴评价 学生反馈 教师反馈 peer-conferencing student feedback teacher feedback
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1[1]Bender C. A study of Teacher and Peer Comments in the Revision Process of College Writers [ J ]. Disserta tion Abstracts International , 1989, (2) :437.
  • 2[2]Berg E., Catherine. The Effects of Trained Peer Response on ESL Students' Revision Types and Writing Qualty[ J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1999, (3) :215 - 241.
  • 3[3]Bruffee K.A. Collaborative Learning and the Conver sation Mankind[ J]. CollegeEnglish, (46) :635 - 652.
  • 4[4]Carson J., Nelson G. Chinese Students' Perceptions of ESL Peer Response Group Interaction [ J ]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1996, (5): 1 - 19.
  • 5[5]Chaudron C. The Effects of Feedback on Students' Composition Revisions [ J ]. RELC Journal, 1984, (15):1 - 14.
  • 6[6]Cheah Y. M. The Examination Culture and Its Im pact on Literacy Innovations: The Case of Singapore[J]. Langue and Education, 1998, (3): 192 - 209.
  • 7[7]Cheng K. M. Excellence in education: Is It Culture -fre? [J] Keynote Paper Presented at the Annual Conference of the Educational Research Association, Singapore, 1996, (11) :22 - 24.
  • 8[8]Cockhart C. Ng Peggy. Analyzing Talk in ESL Peer Response Groups: Stance, Functions and Content [J]. Language learning, 1995, (4) :605 - 655.
  • 9[9]Cohen A. D. Student Processing of Feedback on Their Compositions [ A ]. A. Wenden J., Rubin ( Eds. ). Learner Strategies in Language Learning [ M]. Engle wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice - Hall, 1987.
  • 10[10]Mendonca C., Johson K. Peer review negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction [ J ]. TESOL Quarterly, 1994, (28) :745 - 769.

二级参考文献35

  • 1应惠兰,何莲珍,周颂波.大学公共英语教学改革──以学生为中心的主题教学模式[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(4):23-27. 被引量:305
  • 2王银泉.第33届国际英语教师协会(IATEFL)年会侧记[J].外语界,1999(2):54-55. 被引量:122
  • 3赵晓红.大学英语阅读课教师话语的调查与分析[J].外语界,1998(2):18-23. 被引量:493
  • 4Allwright, R. 1984. The importance of interaction in classroom language learning [ J ]. Applied Linguistics 5.
  • 5Allwright, D. & K. M. Bailey. 1991. Focus on the Language Classroom [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Antón, M. 1999. The discourse of a learner-centered classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacherlearner interaction in the second-language classroom [J]. The Modern Language Journal 83, iii.
  • 7Brock, C. 1986. The effect of referential questions on ESL classroom discourse [ J ]. TESOL Quarterly20/1.
  • 8Brophy, J. 1981. Teacher praise: A functional analysis [J]. Review of Educational Research 51.
  • 9Cathcart, R. L. & J. W. B. Olsen. 1976. Teachers'and students' preferences for correction of classroom conversation errors [A]. In J. F. Fanselow & R.Crymes ( eds. ) . On TESOL ' 76 [C]. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.
  • 10Chaudron, C. 1988. Second Language Classrooms: Research on Teaching and Learning [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

共引文献1027

同被引文献205

引证文献27

二级引证文献254

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部