摘要
《易经》与《老子》之"道"及其"反"、"复",既有表面上的用词相同、相似之处,又有概念内涵上的相互关联之处,还有其所反映思想上的不同之处。《老子》之"道"为点、是生成的原因,《易经》之"道"为圆、是被生成的结果;《老子》之"道"为水,《易经》圆"道"上的《坎》、《坤》也象水;《易经》中"反"、"复"同义,《老子》中"反"、"复"之义相反。《老子》通过阐述"道"之"反"、"复",反映出与《易经》不同的思想。
Although the 'Dao' and its 'Fan' and 'Fu' in Book of Changes and Laozi are similar not only in expressions but in connotations as well, there are some differences in them. The 'Dao' in Laozi is 'a point', which is the cause of reproduction, but the 'Dao' in Book of Changes is 'a circle', which is what is reproduced. Similarly, the 'Dao' in Laozi is 'water', and that of Book of Changes means water too. 'Fan' and 'Fu' in Book of Changes are synonyms, but they are antonyms in Laozi.
出处
《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2003年第3期30-33,共4页
Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
