期刊文献+

《非洲发展新伙伴计划》为什么必须成功——南非学者谈《非洲发展新伙伴计划》等问题 被引量:2

Why NEPAD Must Succeed?——South African Scholar Talks about NEPAD
原文传递
导出
作者 贺文萍
出处 《西亚非洲》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第3期73-74,共2页 West Asia and Africa
  • 相关文献

同被引文献34

  • 1See NEPAD, "Objectives, Standards, Criteria And Indicators For The African Peer Review Mechanism", NEPAD/HSGIC - 03 - 2003/APRM/Guideline/OSCI, 9 March 2003.
  • 2Economic Commission for Africa, "The African Peer Review(APR) Mechanism-Some Frequently Asked Questions", October 2002,p.5.
  • 3Sanusha Naidu, "The New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD) in the Context of Responsiveness and Accountability",June 2004, http: //www.sarpn.org.za.
  • 4International Peace Academy Report, "NEPAD: Africa Initiative, New Partnership?", 16 July 2002, p.4.
  • 5Ross Herbert, "Peer Review: Who Owns the Process?", The Electronic Journal of Governance and Innovation, South Afriam Institute of International Affairs, October 2003, p. 1.
  • 6"NEPAD's Political Peer Review Sows Confusion", October 29, 2002, http: //www. comtexnews.com.
  • 7"Mbeki hat.ks Pahad on NEPAD peer review mechanism", October 30, 2002, http. //www.sabcnews.com.
  • 8"Mbeki clarifies peer review muddle", October 31, 2002, http://www. iafrica.com.
  • 9Malachia Mathoho,"An Mfican Peer Review Mechanism: a panacea for Afics's governance challenges?", http: //www.cps.org.za/execsumm/polbrief29.pdf.
  • 10Colm Allan and Zohra Dawood, "Compliance, Conditionalities and the Role of Independent Monitoring in file Implementation of NEPAD", June 2002, http: //www.sarpn.org.za.

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部