期刊文献+

竞争性电力市场中发电企业的最优报价策略 被引量:3

Optimal Bidding Strategy of a Electricity Company on Competitive Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以竞争性电力市场的环境为研究背景,在各发电企业独立报价的基础上,根据发电企业所拥有的信息是否完全,建立了完全信息及不完全信息静态博弈模型·结合最优化理论给出了发电企业最优报价策略所应满足的条件,以及求解最优报价策略的方法·通过分析,认为:现阶段辽宁电力市场适合于完全信息静态博弈模型;电力市场的交易规则极为重要;固定成本的分摊无助于报价策略的制订· Develops two static game models for an electricity company with one in accordance to complete information and the other to incomplete information, supposing the companies are making bids without cooperation on competitive market. Proposes the conditions in combination with optimization theory which should be satisfied for the optimal bidding strategy of the company, with a solution given to the strategy. Comes to the conclusions through a discussion that at present only the static game model with complete information is applicable to the electricity market of Liaoning, the trade rules are significant to market and to apportion the fixed cost is not helpful to the formulation of a bidding strategy.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第9期885-888,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 辽宁省科技厅软科学基金资助项目(2002401107).
关键词 电力市场 发电企业 报价 交易规则 博弈 最优化 power market electricity company bid trade rule game optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1王瑞瑛,华瑶,李伟.竞价上网中成本的计算方法研究[J].工业技术经济,2002,21(1):104-105. 被引量:3
  • 2盛建伦,于文钦.实时发电成本分析[J].工业技术经济,2002,21(3):128-129. 被引量:2
  • 3王先甲,罗荣桂.分时电价的二层决策模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002,19(1):74-77. 被引量:3
  • 4薛嘉庆.最优化原理与方法[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,1991.218-238.
  • 5Nishimura F, Tabors R D, Ilic M D, et al. Benefit optimization of centralized and decentralized power systems in a multi-utility environment [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1993,8(3):1180-1186.
  • 6Cardell J B, Hitt C C, Hogan W W. Market power and strategic interaction in electricity networks [J]. Resources and Energy Economics, 1997, (19):109-137.
  • 7Newbery D M. Power markets and market power[J]. The Energy Journal, 1995,16 (3):39-66.
  • 8Shehle G. Price based operation in an auction market structure[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1996,11(4):1770-1777.
  • 9Clayton J S,Erwin S R,Gibson C A. Interchange costing and wheeling loss evaluation by means of incremental[J]. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, 1990,5(3):759-765.
  • 10Caramanis M C, Roukos N, Schweppe F C. A tool for evaluation the marginal cost of wheeling [J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 1989,4(2):594-605.

二级参考文献5

  • 1[1]Choi J Y, Rim S H and Park J H. optimal real time pricing of real and reactive powers. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems 1998 13(4): 1226~ 1231.
  • 2[2]Doudlas W C. A comparison of different methodologies in A case study of residential time-of use electricity pricing. J.of Econometrics, 1984, 26:17~ 34.
  • 3[3]Parus R W. Measuring the consumer welfare effects of time-differentiated electricity prices. J.of Econometric, 1984, 26:35 ~ 64.
  • 4[4]Filippini M. Swiss residential demand for electricity by time of use. Energy Journal, 1995, 16(1):27~ 39.
  • 5[5]Singh H, Hao S Y et al. Transmission congestion management in competitive electricity markets. IEEE Transaction on Power Systems, 1998, 13 (2):672~ 680.

共引文献6

同被引文献93

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部