期刊文献+

河南省沙区玉米花生间作对花生铁营养效率及间作优势的影响 被引量:23

The Effects of Peanut Intercropped with Maize on Iron Nutrition Efficiency of Peanut and Intercropping Advantage in Sandy Soil in Henan Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过田间试验研究了两种不同的玉米花生间作方式对作物铁的吸收和利用效率的影响。结果表明 ,间作方式Ⅰ (玉米∶花生的行数比例为 6∶10 )和间作方式Ⅱ (玉米∶花生∶玉米的行数比例为 3∶8∶3)对铁的吸收效率比单作分别增加了 6 8.72 %和 97.6 8% ;而铁的利用效率分别比单作降低了 2 3.2 6 %和 2 4 .0 9%。同时间作方式Ⅰ和间作方式Ⅱ的土地当量比分别为 1.18和 1.2 7(LER >1) ,说明间作改善花生铁营养表现出明显的间作优势。间作改善花生铁营养所表现的间作优势主要来自于作物对铁的吸收效率。作物对铁的利用效率为负值 。 The field experiment was carried out to study the effect of peanut intercropped with maize in different two intercropping systems on iron uptake and utilization efficiency of peanut. In compare with monocropping of peanut, the results showed that the iron uptake efficiency of intercropping system Ⅰ (the ratio of maize and peanut was 6∶10 ) and intercropping systemⅡ (the ratio of maize/peanut/maize was 3∶8∶3) increased by 68.72% and 97.68% respectively, but for the iron utilization efficiency decreased 23.26% and 24.09%. The land equivalent ratio of intercropping Ⅰand intercropping Ⅱ were 1.18 and 1.27, respectively (LER>1). It also indicated that improving iron nutrition of peanut intercropped with maize showed remarkable intercropping advantage. The intercropping advantage of peanut and maize was mainly from iron uptake efficiency of crops, but the iron utilization of crops had no contribution to intercropping advantage. The reciprocation of iron uptake and utilization efficiency of crops also had little contribution to intercropping advantage.
出处 《作物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2003年第5期658-664,共7页 Acta Agronomica Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目 (3 0 170 185 )
关键词 河南 玉米 花生 间作 营养效率 影响因素 行数比例 田间试验 Maize Peanut Intercropping Iron nutrient efficiency Intercropping advantage
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1[1]Trenbath B R. Multiple Cropping Systems. New York: Macmillan. 1986.57-81
  • 2[2]Morris R A, Garrity D P. Resource capture and utilization in intercropping: Water. Field Crops Res, 1993a, 34:303-317
  • 3[3]Morris R A, Garrity D P. Resource capture and utilization in intercrop-ping: Non-nitrogen nutrients. Field Crops Res, 1993b, 34: 319-334
  • 4[4]Allen J R, Obura K. Yield of corn, cowpea and soybean under different intercropping systems. Agron J, 1983, 75:1005-1009
  • 5[5]Rmheld V. The role of phytosiderophores in acquisition of iron and other micronutrients in graminaceous species: An ecological approach. Plant and Soil, 1991,130: 127-134
  • 6[6]Treeby M, Marschner H, Rmheld V. Mobilization of iron and other micronutrient cations from a calcareous soil by plant-borne, microbial, and synthetic metal chelators. Plant and Soil, 1989,114: 217-226
  • 7[7]Bryan G, Hopkins H. Plant utilization of iron solubilized by oat phytosiderophore. J Plant Nutr, 1992,15: 1599-1612
  • 8[8]Dalal R C. Effects of intercropping maize with pigeon on grain yield and nutrient uptake. Exp Agric, 1974,10:219-224
  • 9[9]Willey R W, Reddy M S. A field technique for separating above-and below-ground interactions in intercropping: An experiment with pearl millet/groundnut. Exp Agric, 1981,17:257-264
  • 10[10]Wortman C S, Sengooba Y. The banana-bean intercropping system-bean genotype cropping system interactions. Field Crops Res, 1993,31:19-25

同被引文献457

引证文献23

二级引证文献324

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部