期刊文献+

浅议产妇侧卧位分娩配合无保护会阴接生的临床护理效果 被引量:8

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:总结无保护会阴接生技术+侧卧位分娩流程中适合产妇的干预措施。方法:重点筛选2015年06月-2016年06月入住本院分娩的产妇共326名,均为头位、单胎型初产妇,以不同助产方案为依据予以分组,分析组内有产妇170名,助产工作中选择无保护会阴接生+侧卧位分娩流程;常规组内有产妇156名,助产工作中选择传统模式,对照观察两组分娩质量。结果:常规组内有33名(21.15%)产妇会阴水肿,50名(32.05%)产妇会阴撕裂;分析组分别有15名(8.82%)、28名(16.47%)(P<0.05)。此外,两组会阴侧切数以及出现并发症的新生儿数量对照有显著性特征(P<0.05)。结论:产妇分娩过程中,选择侧卧位分娩模式的基础上,还应落实无保护会阴接生流程,有助于改善分娩质量。 Objective: To summarize the interventions for maternal unprotected perineum delivery technology in the process of delivery + lateral position. Method: focus on screening June 2015- 2016 June admitted to our hospital delivery of maternal 326, are for the head position, a single birth primiparas and with different midwifery program for basis shall be grouped and analysis within the group have maternal 170, without the protection of perineum midwife + lateral position delivery process selection of midwifery; conventional group in maternal 156, midwifery in traditional mode, the quality of delivery of the two groups were observed in control. Results: in the routine group, 33(21.15%) of maternal perineal edema, 50(32.05%) of maternal perineal tear; analysis group were 15(8.82%), 28(16.47%)(P < 0.05). In addition, the number of newborns in the two groups was significantly lower than that of the groups(P < 0.05). Conclusion: women during childbirth, selection based on the mode of delivery in lateral position, should also be implemented without the protection of perineum delivery process, to improve the quality of delivery.
作者 田文纯
出处 《中国妇幼健康研究》 2016年第S2期98-98,共1页 Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词 护理 保护会阴接生 初产妇 分娩质量 侧卧分娩 nursing unprotected perineum delivery primipara delivery quality lateral delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献53

  • 1董金林,倪美菊,朱钟治.会阴Ⅲ度撕裂50例分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,1996,12(3):153-154. 被引量:17
  • 2乐杰.妇产科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009.105.
  • 3胡亚美 江载芳 诸福棠.实用儿科学[M]第7版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002.1900.
  • 4Thacker S B,Banta H D. Benefits and risks of episioto- my: An interpretative review of the English language lit- erature, 1860-1980 [J]. Obstet Gyneeol Surv, 1983, 38 (6) : 322-338.
  • 5Harrison R F,Brennan M,North P M,et al. Is routine episiotomy necessary? [J]. Br Med J, 1984,288 (6435) : 1971-1975.
  • 6Woolley R J. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: A review of the English-language literature since 1980. Part Ⅰ[J]. Obstet Gynecol Surv,1995,50(11) :806-820.
  • 7Boo NY, Cheah IJ. Admission hypothermia among VLBW infants in malaysian NICUs[J]. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 2013,59 (16):447 -452.
  • 8Termote B, Verswijvel G, Gelin G, et al. Neonatal hypoglyeemic brain injury[J]. Jbr Btr,2008,91:116 - 117.
  • 9Lindsay ME, Hovan M J, Deming J R, eta l. Improving hypertension control in diabetes: A multisite quality improvement project that applies a 3 -step care bundle to a chronic disease care model for di abetes with hypertension[J]. American Journal of Medical Quali ty,2013,28(5) :365 - 373.
  • 10Haraden C. What is a bundle[EB/OL].[2006 - 11 -02]. http// www. ihi. org/ IHI/Topics/Critical - Care/Intensive Care, Improvement Stories/What Is a Bundle. htm.

共引文献218

同被引文献43

引证文献8

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部