期刊文献+

自由体位对提高自然分娩与降低剖宫产的临床效果评价 被引量:6

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨自由体位对提高自然分娩与降低剖宫产的临床效果。方法:选取2015年4月至2016年4月我院妇产科收治的临产孕妇300例,随机分成两组,其中150例为对照组,实施常规卧位分娩,另150例为观察组,实施自由体位分娩,观察两组孕妇的分娩情况。结果:观察组孕妇在三个产程所花费的时间显著短于对照组,自然分娩率明显高于对照组(78.00%vs61.33%),会阴侧切率(5.13%vs27.17%)及宫颈裂伤率(0.85%vs4.35%)显著低于对照组;P<0.05,有统计学意义。结论:对孕妇实施自由体位分娩,可有效缩短孕妇的分娩时间,减少痛苦,提高自然分娩率,值得临床推广应用。 Objective: to study the free position to improve the clinical effect of natural birth and reduce cesarean delivery. Methods: to choose between April 2015 and April 2015 treated 300 cases of pregnant women in labor, obstetrics and gynecology hospital were divided into two groups at random, in which 150 cases as control group, implementation of conventional fowler’s birth, in the other group, 150 cases to observe free position childbirth, observe two groups of pregnant women delivery situation. Results: the observation group of pregnant women in the three stages of the time it takes to significantly shorter than the control group, natural births are significantly higher than the control group(78.00% vs61.33 %), episiotomy rate(5.13% vs27.17 %) and the rate of cervical laceration vs4.35 %(0.85%) was significantly lower than the control group; P < 0.05, there is statistical significance. Conclusion: the implementation of free position for the pregnant woman childbirth, can effectively shorten the d
作者 汪月梅 胡洋
出处 《中国妇幼健康研究》 2017年第S1期393-394,共2页 Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献52

  • 1丁依玲,黄丽霞.分娩期的体位[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2005,21(5):259-260. 被引量:90
  • 2段涛,杨慧霞,等.高危妊娠[M].第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.379-386.
  • 3曾筱蓉,许章英,杨建茹,郭少芳.人性化服务模式与自由体位分娩结合应用的探讨[J].现代护理,2007,13(05Z):1321-1322. 被引量:10
  • 4凌萝达.难产[M].第2版.重庆:重庆出版社,2004:57
  • 5Fahy K,Hastie C,Bisits A,et al. Holistic physiological care compared with active management of the third stage of labour for women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage:A cohort study[J]. Women Birth,2010,23(4) : 146-152.
  • 6Charoenboon C,Srisupundit K,Tongsong T.Rise in cesarean section rate over a 20-year period in a public sector hospital in northern Thailand[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet,2013,287:47-52.
  • 7Gagnon AJ,Hulst A,Merry L,et al.Cesarean section rate differences by migration indicators[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet,2013,287:633-639.
  • 8Anita J.Gagnon,Andrea Hulst,Lisa Merry,et al.Cesarean section rate differences by migration indicators[J].Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics,2013(4):575-579.
  • 9Elvander C, Ahlberg M, Thies-Lagergren L, et al . Birth po- sition and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a population-based study of 113 000 spontaneous births I-J3. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2015, 16(1,) ! 262.
  • 10Benn P, Borell A, Chiu R, et al . Position statement from the Aneuploidy Screening Committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis EJ~. Prenatal diagnosis, 2013, 33(7) : 622-629.

共引文献182

同被引文献51

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部