湿性愈合与干性愈合治疗压疮病人的随机对照研究

目的:对比分析湿性愈合与干性愈合治疗压疮病人的临床效果。方法:选取2015年3月至2016年2月间64例压疮患者,依据随机、对照原则分为实验组和对照组,分别采用湿性愈合压疮治疗和传统干性愈合压疮治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效。结果:实验组治疗总有效率(93.8%)高于对照组(75.0%),且疮面愈合时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与干性愈合治疗相比,湿性愈合治疗压疮,能够提高治疗效果,缩短疮面愈合时间。

Objective:To compare the clinical effect of wet healing and dry healing in patients with pressure sores.Methods:Sixty-four patients with pressure sores from March 2015 to February 2016 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group according to the principle of randomization and control,the patients were treated with wet healing pressure sore and traditional dry healing pressure sore respectively,the clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared.Results:The experimental group total effective rate(93.8%) higher than that of the control group(75%), and wound healing time was shorter than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05).Conclusion:Compared with dry healing therapy, wet healing treatment of pressure sores, can improve the therapeutic effect, shorten the wound healing time.