摘要
目的:对比鼻烟窝和前臂动静脉内瘘功能良好(fistula used successfully for hemodialysis,FUSH)率。方法:选取我院尿毒症患者103例,根据动静脉内瘘的部位的不同分为鼻烟窝组和前臂组,回顾性比较两组内瘘功能良好率的情况。结果:前臂组的内瘘功能良好率高于鼻烟窝组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:鼻烟窝和前臂内瘘均是理想的血管通路,前臂组内瘘功能良好率更高,但是整体血管通路寿命需要更长时间的统计分析。
Objective:To compare the rate of between snuffbox and forearm arteriovenous fistula(FUSH).Methods: 103 cases of uremic patients in our hospital, According to the difference of the arteriovenous fistula at the site of snuffbox arteriovenous fistula group and forearm fistula group, were compared between the two groups in the rate of FUSH. Results:The rate of forearm FUSH is higher than the snuffbox FUSH, the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion: snuffbox and forearm fistula are the ideal vascular access, The rate of forearm FUSH is higher,But Lifetime of the overall vascular access takes a longer period of statistical analysis.
出处
《中国妇幼健康研究》
2017年第S2期112-112,共1页
Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词
鼻烟窝动静脉内瘘
前臂动静脉内瘘
内瘘功能良好
snuffbox arteriovenous fistula
forearm internal arteriovenous
fistula used successfully for hemodialysis