共情技术对围手术期前列腺癌患者生活质量、心理状态及主观幸福感的影响

目的:探讨共情技术对围手术期老年前列腺癌患者生活质量、心理状态及主观幸福感的影响。方法:选择2013年1月-2015年1月在我院就诊的前列腺癌患者130例作为研究对象,随机分成两组,各65例。对照组:患者围手术期接受常规护理。观察组:患者住院治疗期间接受常规护理的同时实施共情技术。比较两组患者干预后生活质量各项指标的评分,比较干预前后两组患者SDS、SAS评分的变化,同时比较干预前后两组患者主观幸福感评分的变化。结果:干预后,观察组患者生活质量中的躯体功能、社会功能、认知功能、情绪功能、角色功能、整体生活质量的评分高于对照组,而疼痛、便秘、恶心呕吐、疲劳、失眠、经济困难、呼吸困难、食欲丧失、腹泻的评分则低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。干预后,观察组患者SDS、SAS评分低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。干预后,观察组患者主观幸福感评分高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:共情技术能够有效缓解前列腺癌患者的焦虑抑郁情绪,显著改善患者的生活质量,提高患者的主观幸福感。

Objective:To investigate the effect of empathy technology on quality of life, mental status and subjective well-being in patients with prostate cancer in perioperative.Methods:Choose 130 cases of prostate cancer patients as the research object, in January-2015 year in January 2013, in our hospital, were randomly divided into two groups, each of 65 cases. Control group: patients hospitalized during the perioperative, received conventional care. The observation group: the patients during hospitalization, received routine nursing, while the implementation of empathy technique. Comparison of quality of life indicators of the score in the intervention in the two groups. The SDS and SAS scores were compared with the two groups in the intervention group. The subjective well-being score was compared with the two groups at the same time. Results:After the intervention, the quality of life, physical function, social function, cognitive function, emotional function, role function, overall quality of life scores in the observation group were higher than those in the control group. Conclusion:Empathy technology can effectively relieve the anxiety and depression of patients with prostate cancer, improve the quality of life and improve the subjective well-being.