摘要
目的:比较以家庭医生式行为干预与常规干预对围绝经期糖尿病并发骨质疏松疾病患者的影响,阐明两者的临床价值。方法:选择与家庭医生签约的围绝经期糖尿病妇女骨质疏松患者50例作为观察组,选择非签约的门诊围绝经期尿病妇女骨质疏松患者50例作为对照组;观察组患者实施家庭医生式行为干预模式,重点就血糖及骨密度变化、疼痛及生活质量变化情况等方面,对两组患者进行比较分析。结果:所有患者的血糖值均有所下降,延缓骨质流失,骨密度值上升,疼痛程度减轻,生活质量明显提高;但是与观察组相比,对照组患者的改善程度较小;两组数据进行统计学比较有意义。结论:家庭医生式行为干预效果显著,能够明显控制住患者的病情,减轻患者的疼痛程度,提高患者的生活质量,在熟悉的环境中家庭医生式的照顾能够缩短患者适应的时间,减轻患者的心理压力,从而提高治疗依从性;临床应用价值高,值得广泛推行。
Objective: To compare the effect of family doctor-type behavior intervention and routine intervention on perimenopausal diabetic patients with osteoporosis, and to clarify the clinical value of both. Methods: Fifty patients with postmenopausal diabetes were enrolled in this study. Fifty patients with osteoporosis were selected as the observation group. Fifty patients were selected as the control group. The patients in the observation group were treated with family doctoral behavior intervention mode, focusing on blood glucose and bone mineral density, Pain and quality of life changes in the two groups of patients were compared analysis. Results: All patients had a decrease in blood glucose level,delayed bone loss, increased bone mineral density, reduced pain and improved quality of life. However, compared with the observation group, the improvement of the control group was smaller. The data of the two groups were statistically significance. Conclusion: The effect of family doctor-type behavior intervention is obvious, which can obviously control the condition of the patient, reduce the pain of the patient and improve the quality of life of the patient. It can shorten the time of patient’s adaptation and reduce the psychological pressure of the patient in the familiar environment Treatment compliance; clinical application value is high, worthy of extensive implementation.
出处
《中国妇幼健康研究》
2017年第S2期494-495,共2页
Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词
家庭医生式行为干预
围绝经期妇女
糖尿病合并骨质疏松
效果对比
family doctor behavior intervention
perimenopausal women
diabetes mellitus with osteoporosis
effect comparison