期刊文献+

交替输液法在预防20%甘露醇致静脉炎中的效果观察 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察脑水肿、颅高压患者采用交替输液法预防20%甘露醇致静脉炎发生的效果。方法:将2017年1月-2017年8月神经内科126例使用留置套管针进行治疗的患者随机分为观察组63例,对照组63例。对照组患者使用前臂留置一个套管针进行输液治疗,观察组使用左右前臂各留置一个套管针进行交替输液治疗,观察48小时后两组患者静脉炎的发生率,96小时后留置针留置时间。结果:观察组静脉炎发生率为15.873%,对照组为46.032%,P<0.05具有统计学意义。结论:交替输液法减少了患者静脉炎的发生率。 Objective: To observe the effect of Alternate infusion method on prevention of phlebitis caused by 20% mannitol in patients with brain edema and cranial hypertension. METHODS: A total of 126 patients with neurosurgery from January 2017 to August 2017 were randomly divided into observation group(n = 63) and control group(n = 63). The patients in the control group were treated with a trocar with a forearm with a trochanter. The observation group was treated with left and right forearm with a trocar. The incidence of phlebitis was observed in the two groups after 48 hours. After 96 hours, the indwelling time The Results: The incidence of phlebitis was 15.873% in the observation group and 46.032% in the control group, P <0.05 was statistically significant. Conclusion: Alternate infusion method reduces the incidence of phlebitis in patients
出处 《中国妇幼健康研究》 2017年第S3期79-80,共2页 Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献37

  • 1黄洁君.46例白血病患儿留置静脉套管针的护理[J].护士进修杂志,1994,9(5):48-48.
  • 2王建荣.输液治疗护理实践指南与实施细则[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011:37.
  • 3SBU. Regelbundet byte av perifer venkateter (PVK) for art {orebygga tromboflebit. [2011-08-12]. http://www, sbu. se/sv/Publicerat / Alert/Regelbundet-byte-av-perier- venkateter-PVK-for-att-forebygga-t romboflebit/.
  • 4Rickardl C M, McCann D, Munnings J, et al. Routine resite of peripheral intravenous devices every 3 days did not reduce complications compared with clinically indica- ted resitea randomised controlled trial[J]. BMC Med, 2010,8(1) :53-63.
  • 5Higginson R. Infection control and intravenous therapy in patients in the community[J]. Br J Community Nurs, 2010,15(7) : 318-324.
  • 6Maki D G,Kluger D M,Crnich C J. The risk of blood- stream infection in adults with different intravascular de- vices:a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies[J]. Mayo Clin Proc,2006,81(9) .. 1159-1171.
  • 7Robinson-Reilly M,Fletcher T. PICC innovation leads to improved health services[J]. Aust Nurs J, 2006,14(3): 29-35.
  • 8Uslusoy E, Mete S. Predisposing factors to phlebitis in pa- tients with peripheral intra-venous catheters: descriptive study[J]. J Am Aead Nurse Pract,2008,20(4) : 172-180.
  • 9Nishanth S, Sivaram G, Kalayarasanr R, et al. Does elec- tive re-siting of intravenous cannulae decrease peripheral thrombophlebitis? A randomized controlled study[J]. Natl Med J India,2009,22(2):60-62.
  • 10Trim J C. Peripheral intravenous catheters: Considera- tions in theory and practice[J] Br J Nurs, 2005,14(12) .. 654-658.

共引文献7

同被引文献22

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部