期刊文献+

腹腔镜阑尾切除术用于阑尾炎治疗的临床效果观察 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术用于阑尾炎治疗的临床效果。方法:取取108例阑尾炎患者,随机分成观察组和对照组。对照组实施传统的开腹手术治疗,观察组实施腹腔镜阑尾切除术,观察和对比两组治疗的效果。结果:观察组患者手术时间、出血量、住院时间以及镇痛剂使用次数都明显少于对照组,两组对比差异明显(P<0.05);观察组并发症发生率为7.41%,对照组并发症发生率为18.52%,观察组明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组患者术后生活质量明显优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:采用腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎效果显著,值得临床推广。 Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis. Methods: 108 patients with appendicitis were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group. The control group was treated with traditional laparotomy, and the observation group was treated with laparoscopic appendectomy. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were observed and compared. Results: the observation group of patients with operation time, amount of bleeding, hospitalization time and analgesic use times are significantly less than the control group, two groups had significant differences(P<0.05); the complication rate of observation group was 7.41%, the complication rate of control group was 18.52%, the observation group was significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05). The quality of life in the observation group was obviously better than that in the control group(P<0.05). Conclusion: laparoscopic appendectomy is effective in the treatment of appendicitis, and is worthy of clinical promotion.
作者 沈彬彬 蔡民
出处 《中国妇幼健康研究》 2017年第S3期452-452,共1页 Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词 腹腔镜阑尾切除术 开腹手术 阑尾炎 临床效果 laparoscopic appendectomy Open operation Appendicitis Clinical effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献26

  • 1罗加兴,贺更生,肖友忠,王志伟.急性阑尾炎并腹膜炎术后不置腹腔引流对临床疗效的影响[J].中国现代医学杂志,2005,15(7):1067-1069. 被引量:23
  • 2江厚象,潘凯,夏利刚,陈小春,谢友龙,洪英才.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗特殊类型的阑尾炎的技术分析和研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(4):350-352. 被引量:20
  • 3Marzouk M,Khater M,Elsadek M,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:a prospective comparative study of 227 patients[J].Surg Endosc,2003,17(5):721-724.
  • 4Menezes M,Das L,Alagtal M,et al.Laparoscopic appendectomy is recommended for the treatment of complicated appendicitis in children[J].Pediatr Surg Int,2008,24(3):303-305.
  • 5Yau KK,Siu WT,Tang CN,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis[J].J Am Coll Surg,2007,205(1):60-65.
  • 6St Peter SD,Sharp SW,Holcomb GW 3rd,et al.An evidence-based definition for perforated appendicitis derived from a prospective randomized trial[J].J Pediatr Surg,2008,43(12):2242-2245.
  • 7Katkhouda N,Mason RJ,Towfigh S,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy:a prospective randomized double-blind study[J].Ann Surg,2005,242(3):439-450.
  • 8Taqi E,Al Hadher S,Ryckman J,et al.Outcome of laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children[J].J Pediatr Surg,2008,43(5):893-895.
  • 9Pokala N,Sadhasivam S,Kiran RP,et al.Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach:outcome in a community hospital setting[J].Am Surg,2007,73(8):737-741.
  • 10Lin HF,Wu JM,Tseng LM,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2006,10(6):906-910.

共引文献51

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部