摘要
目的:分析非药物性分娩镇痛在临床的应用方法、效果及护理体会。方法:选取2017年1月-2017年6月期间我院收治的120例行自然分娩的产妇作为研究对象,所有产妇均采用非药物性镇痛,其中按照非药物性镇痛方法不同,将产妇分为对照组(导乐分娩法)及实验组(导乐分娩法结合中医护理技术),比较护理效果。结果:实验组产妇的产时平均NRS疼痛评分为(6.87±1.47)分,对照组产妇的产时平均NRS疼痛评分为(7.82±1.59)分,将两组产妇的产时NRS疼痛评分比较,组间数据差异显著,P<0.05,有统计学意义。结论:两种非药物性镇痛方法均能较好的减轻产妇的分娩疼痛感,其中导乐分娩法结合中医护理技术镇痛效果更佳,有效缩短了产妇产程时间,值得临床推广。
Objective: to analyze the clinical application method, effect and nursing experience of non-drug delivery analgesia. Selection methods: January 2017-June 2017, our hospital during the period of 120 natural childbirth puerpera as the research object, all women are using non drug analgesia, which according to the different non drug analgesia, women can be divided into the control group(guide) le childbirth and the experimental group(integrated nursing of TCM), is nursing effect. Results: the maternal intrapartum average NRS pain score was(6.87±1.47), the control of maternal intrapartum average NRS pain score was(7.82±1.59), the two groups of maternal intrapartum NRS pain score comparison, data significant difference between groups, P < 0.05, with statistical significance. Conclusion: two methods of non drug analgesia can better reduce puerpera childbirth pain, the doctor of traditional Chinese medicine comprehensive nursing better analgesia effect, effectively shorten the maternal labor time, worth clinical promotion.
出处
《中国妇幼健康研究》
2017年第S3期524-525,共2页
Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词
非药物性镇痛
分娩
中医护理
导乐陪伴
non drug analgesia
delivery
Chinese medicine nursing
doula