耐人寻味的吊诡——关于2007年国家司法考试第四卷第一题的省思

The Odd Afford for Thought—On the Question 1 Test 4 of the 2007 National Bar Examination

司法考试的考题及其答案应当符合考试大纲,具有法律性质,同时能够辨识应试者法学专业素养的高低。2007年国家司法考试第四卷第一题之命题完全符合规范要求,但其答案之法律性质稍弱,同时对考生法律专业素养不具辨识力。此种现象的出现主要源于法律界对于经典政治命题的生硬照搬并未考虑到法学自身的特殊性,体现出自身的不成熟。

The questions and their answers should be juristic and be i- dentical with the outline of the test. They can help to identify the exami- nee who has the professional knowledge and skills. The question 1 test 4 of the 2007 National Bar Examination conform to the above normative re- quirements, but the answer to it is not, and at least a little weak juristic. It also has not the capability of identifying the suitable examinee. All of these phenomenons are cause by the immaturity of the legal science which always copy the classical political propositions and ignore the characteris- tics of itself.