在价值理想与客观认知之间:法律明确性原则的理论空间

Between Value Ideal and Objective Cognition: the Theoretical Space of the Principle of Legal Clarity

法律明确性围绕着规则预告与权力拘束两个作用展开,特别是现代政治——法律理论出于对权力的不信任,围绕着权力拘束作用,在法律理论的方方面面形成了某种绝对明确性的理论诉求,在立法上要求彻底明确、行政法中要求严格限制裁量权的适用、司法中预设唯一正解。而当语义学和法哲学的相关理论引入到法律明确性的论域时,绝对明确性受到了全方位的质疑。凯尔森的"框架"法律理论为我们重新理解法律明确性原则建立了一个新的诠释模型,在这种相对明确性的理论框架下,适用者的自由裁量空间得以证立,从而使得法律适应现代社会需求,同时法律拘束权力的诉求也能得到满足。

The clarity of law revolves around the two roles of rule forecasting and power restraint. In particular, modern politics-legal theory is based on the distrust of power, and around the role of power restraint, it forms some absolute clarity in all aspects of legal theory. The theoretical demands are completely clear in the legislation, and the administrative requirements for the elimination of discretion are strictly applied, and the only positive solution in the judicial system. When the relevant theories of semantics and legal philosophy are introduced into the field of legal clarity, absolute clarity is questioned in all aspects. Kelsen’s 'framework' legal theory establishes a new model of interpretation for us to re-understand the principle of legal clarity. Under this relatively clear theoretical framework, the free will of the applicator can be justified to adapt the law. The demands of modern society and the demands of legal restraint power can also be met at the same time.