期刊文献+

Evaluation of glacial resource potential for sustaining kuhl irrigation system under changing climate in the Himalayan region

Evaluation of glacial resource potential for sustaining kuhl irrigation system under changing climate in the Himalayan region
下载PDF
导出
摘要 A large numbers of mountain communities in the Himalayan region depend on glacier-fed kuhl system – gravity flow irrigation, for their sustenance. The depletion and retreat of glaciers often result in disruption of melt flows to kuhl system, which ultimately impacts the agriculture as well as livelihood of the local communities. Sustainability of glacial resource was assessed for establishing kuhl irrigation system based on indices of glacier decrease by number(GDN) and glacier depletion by volume(GDV) during the 2001-2013 period. The selected factors are important in terms of understanding point source and reserve potential of glaciers for sustaining glacier-fed kuhl irrigation in this region. The sustainability of glaciers was found good(i.e. a least decrease or rather increase in glacier number and volume) in about 23.6% glaciers(ice reserves about 705.9 km^3) under >10 km^2 area class of glaciers mainly in Gilgit and Shigar river basins of the Karakoram range. In the 5–10 km^2 class of glaciers, sustainability was good in 49 glaciers(ice reserve 26.59 km^3) and under 1–5 km^2 class, in 558 glaciers(ice reserve 60.189 km^3). Overall sustainability of glaciers appears to prevail in the Karakoram basins. The lesser sustainability of glaciers in the Himalaya basins like Astore and Jhelum would apparently be compensated by monsoon and change in rainfall pattern. A regular monitoring of the glacier resource and utilizing advance water conservation techniques would help in coping with negative impacts of downwasting of glaciers and provide long-term support to kuhl irrigation system in the Himalayan region in future. A large numbers of mountain communities in the Himalayan region depend on glacier-fed kuhl system – gravity flow irrigation, for their sustenance. The depletion and retreat of glaciers often result in disruption of melt flows to kuhl system, which ultimately impacts the agriculture as well as livelihood of the local communities. Sustainability of glacial resource was assessed for establishing kuhl irrigation system based on indices of glacier decrease by number(GDN) and glacier depletion by volume(GDV) during the 2001-2013 period. The selected factors are important in terms of understanding point source and reserve potential of glaciers for sustaining glacier-fed kuhl irrigation in this region. The sustainability of glaciers was found good(i.e. a least decrease or rather increase in glacier number and volume) in about 23.6% glaciers(ice reserves about 705.9 km^3) under >10 km^2 area class of glaciers mainly in Gilgit and Shigar river basins of the Karakoram range. In the 5–10 km^2 class of glaciers, sustainability was good in 49 glaciers(ice reserve 26.59 km^3) and under 1–5 km^2 class, in 558 glaciers(ice reserve 60.189 km^3). Overall sustainability of glaciers appears to prevail in the Karakoram basins. The lesser sustainability of glaciers in the Himalaya basins like Astore and Jhelum would apparently be compensated by monsoon and change in rainfall pattern. A regular monitoring of the glacier resource and utilizing advance water conservation techniques would help in coping with negative impacts of downwasting of glaciers and provide long-term support to kuhl irrigation system in the Himalayan region in future.
机构地区 Climate
出处 《Journal of Mountain Science》 SCIE CSCD 2019年第5期1150-1159,共10页 山地科学学报(英文)
关键词 Kuhl IRRIGATION GLACIAL resource KARAKORAM HIMALAYA HINDU Kush Kuhl irrigation Glacial resource Karakoram Himalaya Hindu Kush
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献31

  • 1Ahmad N and Chaudhry GR (1988) Irrigated Agriculture of Pakistan. Lahore, Pakistan.
  • 2Ahmed M (2003) Issues in water policy reforms. In: Bengali K (ed.), The politics of managing water. Islamabad, Pakistan. pp 73-81.
  • 3Alam AU (2002) Questioning the water wars rationale. A case study of the Indus Water Treaty. The Geographical Journal 168(4): 341-353.
  • 4Alauddin M (2008) Agricultural intensification, irrigation and the environment in South Asia: Issues and policy options. Ecological Economies 65(1): 111-124.
  • 5All SH(2008) Water politics in South Asia. Technocratic cooperation and lasting security in the Indus Basin and beyond. Journal of International Affairs 61(2): 167-182.
  • 6Barnaby W (2009) Do nations go to war over water? Nature 458: 282-283.
  • 7Beg A and Khan K (2006) Empowerment of civil society for sustainable development. A case study of the Karakoram Area Development Organization in Hunza. In: Kreutzmann H (ed.), Karakoram in transition. Culture, development, and ecology in the Hunza Valley. Karachi, Pakistan, Oxford, England. pp 382-393.
  • 8Erenstein O (2009) Comparing water management in rice- wheat production systems in Haryana, India and Punjab, Pakistan. Agricultural Water Management 96(12): 1799-1806.
  • 9GoGB [Government of Gilgit-Baltistan] (2010) Gilgit-Baltistan of Pakistan. [www.gilgitbaltistan.gov.pk/index.php?option= com_content&view=article&id=89&Itemid=121; accessed on 4 October 2010].
  • 10GoP [Government of Pakistan, Ministry of Finance] (2010) Pakistan Economic Survey 2009-10. Islamabad. [www.finance.gov.pk/survey_0910.html; accessed on 2 October 2010].

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部