摘要
在法治中国的建设中,法律修辞作为一门贯穿于法治理论和司法实践之间的能动司法方法,是法律思维的过程再现,也是对法治建设中制度性规则和思维性规则的遵守。修辞方法不仅体现为微观领域的说服技巧,而且也是宏观领域中的论辩活动。在裁判过程中,通过"可接受"的前提选择和"可废止"的形式构建从而实现特定语境中的主体间说服,以"讲法说理"的方式弥补着法官裁判中解释和推理等司法方法的机械被动或价值缺位,从而增强司法裁判的可接受性,树立起司法的公信力和权威性,在法律效果与社会效果的统一过程中实现司法裁判的人文价值关怀。
During the construction of ruling by law in China,legal rhetoric is an active judicial method throughout the rule of law theory and judicial practice. It is not only the reapperarce of legal thinking process,but also comply with the system rules and thinking rules in the construction of the rule of law. The rhetorical method is both embodied with the micro persuasion skills and debate activities in the field of macro. In the process of sen-tence,we could realize the persuasion among subjects in specific contexts through the selection of "acceptable"premise and "abolished" type building,and by using the method of reasonable claim to make up the mechanical passiveness or the absence of value in the form of judicial interpretation and reasoning. In this way,the judge may strengthen the acceptability of judicial judgment,establish the credibility and authority of justice and realize the hu-manistic value of care in the process of the unity of legal effect and social effect.
出处
《山东青年政治学院学报》
2014年第5期102-109,共8页
Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地吉林大学理论法学研究中心重大项目"法律方法理论研究"(10JJD820008)阶段性成果
关键词
法律修辞
修辞论辩
可接受性
听众共识
legal rhetoric
rhetorical argument
acceptability
the audience consensus